Drakel said
I won't deny any of this though I want to point out some flaws in this system that was only just discovered by our current array of newbs.They fucking WORSHIP nat or they did at one point or another. Now when that happens we get people like Joe (Sorry dude, You're currently not terrible imo... but you were and even you came to realize this) who come in, sees nat and then tries to mimic Nat's personality and either try to "replace Nat" making us accept them like we accepted Nat, or they idolize him, making them act like a Nat clone and thus we get even more SHITTIER members until they realize that we all hate that shit (including Nat) and either leave in shame or try to change their ways and actually STOP acting like someone else. I admit nat isn't the worst thing to come into spam but he sure as hell isn't the best either. While yes the system you state is half true, it still doesn't completely prevent completely shit members from joining. Not to mention that when we don't get an influx of newbs, when nat does post a shit-ton of threads and floods spam than we get older members bitching about nat and we ALL know that shit is annoying. It's a lose/lose unless the system does work...So yeah... There are a lot more variables than what you're adding for that system K-9... and I only added a select few out of the bunch that may give you a completely different result than what you wanted. Sorry if this shatters your dreams. :(
Honestly, if people weren't so quick to declare any new person the 'New Nat' then perhaps they wouldn't latch on to and embrace that concept. People can be stupid on their own grounds without needing a comparison to Nat.
