Alright, I like all of the NS, by looking at them. But I might not read some until the weekend, due to school. Just a headsup.
And, Rhymer, mind you remove that NS, please? I just like to keep things in order.
So Boerd said
And I was right in Trayvon Martin's case.I am not 100% sure, as a matter of fact, I used the word "preponderance", which means 51%. I sided with Wilson because of Occam's razor, that being the simplest solution tends to be correct. Wilson's version of events requires significantly less suspension of belief.Difficult to believe elements of Wilson's story:~Unarmed kid assaults armed officer. Which isn't that difficult to believe.Difficult to believe elements of the "Wilson=murder" side:~Racist cop leaves witness.~Racist cop kills in broad daylight~Cop can't shoot for anything, when he is uninjured and can take as much time to aim as he wants, or get closer.~Kid who just commits robbery and is walking down the street doesn't get off the street when told to by a cop for no reason, rather than he fears impending arrest.~Al Sharpton is correct on anything.
Pepperm1nts said
I was the first to criticize the UR's decision to go to war, and I still think it's wrong, but I see the opportunity in it. It's messed up, but the UR will probably profit a lot from it.
Dannaroo said
This.I think it's probably more than three extra though if you count war updates inbetween the main updates. To me, it's unfair that one nation is able to expand their navy faster than another just because the first nation is at war. In my opinion war orders should be used for troop/fleet movements only.
ASTA said
Who?
So Boerd said
My mistake. 19 then.
So Boerd said
In three years, he'll be 17, have handled a gun, and will have realized how ridiculous he used to be. Growing up does that to people.
mdk said
lol, well, his father didn't do shit if all he did was roll over and die.
Magic Magnum said
Rare, did you even read over the discussion regarding shooting to be non-lethal and the issues with that? There's at least an entire page of it.Also, may the father have done good as an officer or not the Kid is still going to feel awful if his Dad's death was preventable but wasn't prevented out of concern for the murderer.
Omega said
"We know it sucks you dad died, but you can live happy knowing that he died being stabbed to death rather than potentially wrongfully killing his murderer."
Imperfectionist said
It's simply unrealistic, Rare. If you were a cop, you would have gone through training, with your firearm and otherwise... And the threat of death is a lot scarier than you think. If someone was actually trying to kill you, and you still had use of your firearm, I assure you that you would not allow that person to stab you to death. It would be reflex, as much as anything, but you would not lay on the ground to die.
Omega said
Also you literally could not be a cop, if you cannot kill someone in self-defense then you cannot be expected to kill in the defense of others. It is not a pretty part of the job but every so often is a necessary one, if cops refuse to kill, if they all only carried one-shot tazers then they would die a lot more often than they do now and a lot more innocent people would die with them.Things like this do happen:It is miracle there were no fatalities except for the shooters and it was catastrophic enough that the police lacked rifles or other weapons with the necessary capability to defeat the body armor of the shooters.
So Boerd said
Suppose, Rare, you are 20 yards away from an old lady and there's a guy with a knife running at her 10 yards to her right. You have a gun. What do you do? "Never kill the bad guys, ever?"