Hmmm. I suppose I could live with the winning bonus. obviously I would prefer the wagered points from everyone then distributed to the top three. But majority shall always rule.
And no, IN, nit become a master swordsmen, I'm more referring to magical abilities. For instance Adinraen's ability to mentally control his ring blade, or.being able to use a weapon that only responds to the original owner.
Just wanna make sure everything is straight before I take this to Mahz
So if you guys could decide.
Are we agreed on
100 - win 25 - loss 50 draw
And what's the ruling on sanctioned tournaments? I'm a fan of wagered points fROM everyone, and doled out to the top three.
That's pretty much all we need to decide for as it comes to the rankings. The rest don't need Mahz approval o to speak, as at can handle that ourselves.
--
I would also like to add a provision for wagered items. Winner should get the ability to actually use the item, perhaps not all abilities associated with the original user but enough so they aren't trying to wield a virtually useless weapon to them.
That's what I thought you meant. mundane items and the like can easily be replaced. But I don't suspect most will be going for those anyway without some underlying reason.
I don't think they should just pop up sort a new sword all Willy nilly because they lost the last one. Otherwise wagering may as well be off the table.
So at the moment we're at wagable points(gained via tournament used for waging in normal fights) 100 X Each Victor Points per everyone who posts Points wages by everyone then distributed among top three.