Robeatics

Create-A-Hero: A Superhero RPG (Closed)

Chipping away at a post. Wish me luck.

Destroy the Godmodder! (v2.0)

The cat has begun to lick the underside of its leg, lifting its little back paw high above its head. What an adorable display of its natural feline flexibility! GROOMING: IIII

Checking Santa's Privilege

Official government surveys showed that women commit a great amount of domestic abuse, also there are official surveys that show that women specifically mothers hold the majority in abuse against children, but of course feminists never talk about that because it undermines their propaganda of making women look superior to men. I care about men's rights otherwise I would be a white knight believing everything that the feminist movement told me. I fully support father's rights and have plenty of proof of how terrible the custody courts are and how divorce and child support can literally take away all of a man's money and not be allowed to see his kids.

@The Patriarch

Look guy, all you're doing is inaccurately defining the majority of feminism and listing off problems in society that feminists seek to rectify. Just because their movement focuses on women doesn't mean that they believe women should be superior or that we should all ignore men's problems completely. Look here, it has plenty of links to sources. Also here. And here. And here too.

@Robeatics

But the fact is you can't seem to handle the idea of critics of feminism, that's why people view it like a religion

@The Patriarch

I can handle criticism when it isn't based around false information and assumption. I want to clear up the misconceptions, which I hope I did here.

@Robeatics

my criticisms are true and all of the hateful things that MRA about are words that feminists have said. As I said I am going keep exposing the movement for what it is and people are waking up. More and more people are abandoning feminism and joining men's rights. We are fairly diverse.

@The Patriarch

Very diverse. Listen. If you really want to say that droves of people are becoming MRAs, why? What about Men's Rights Activism is superior to feminism? I've already proven that feminism helps people of every gender, class and race. The only people I can imagine who would consider being against feminism would be people who know nothing about feminism at all. If you really want to go down the "MRAs vs. Feminism" road: Give me a sales pitch for Men's Rights Activism without mentioning feminism. Assume I'm a prospective activist, but I'm on the fence about the two movements. If the only thing your version of the Men's Rights Movement has going for it is that it's not feminism--despite having pretty much the same goals--what's the point? What do MRAs do or try to do for men of color? LGBTQ men? Abused men? Male victims of sexual violence? Male victims of abuse? If feminism helps all of these groups, what is the point of MRAs struggling against it? Aren't they only hindering men?

@Robeatics

Men's Rights fights for the rights of fathers, and are against institutionalized sexism against such as the belief that it is okay and sometimes funny for a woman to hit a man, we are also against the sexist view of males being viewed as the sole contributor of abuse and violence domestically. We are for equal sentencing and are against the fact that women get easier training in military to make it easier for more women to join the marines. We support the rights of homosexuals and also are regularly exposing female sex predators and abusive celebrities. MRA are also against the fact that women don't have to sign up for selective services to get the right to vote but men have to. We are also against the fact false sexual assault allegations are swept under the rug. There you go I didn't mention feminism once.

@The Patriarch

That's what feminism already does. Why do we have to fight one another?

Checking Santa's Privilege

Official government surveys showed that women commit a great amount of domestic abuse, also there are official surveys that show that women specifically mothers hold the majority in abuse against children, but of course feminists never talk about that because it undermines their propaganda of making women look superior to men. I care about men's rights otherwise I would be a white knight believing everything that the feminist movement told me. I fully support father's rights and have plenty of proof of how terrible the custody courts are and how divorce and child support can literally take away all of a man's money and not be allowed to see his kids.

@The Patriarch

Look guy, all you're doing is inaccurately defining the majority of feminism and listing off problems in society that feminists seek to rectify. Just because their movement focuses on women doesn't mean that they believe women should be superior or that we should all ignore men's problems completely. Look here, it has plenty of links to sources. Also here. And here. And here too.

@Robeatics

But the fact is you can't seem to handle the idea of critics of feminism, that's why people view it like a religion

@The Patriarch

I can handle criticism when it isn't based around false information and assumption. I want to clear up the misconceptions, which I hope I did here.

@Robeatics

my criticisms are true and all of the hateful things that MRA about are words that feminists have said. As I said I am going keep exposing the movement for what it is and people are waking up. More and more people are abandoning feminism and joining men's rights. We are fairly diverse.

@The Patriarch

Very diverse. Listen. If you really want to say that droves of people are becoming MRAs, why? What about Men's Rights Activism is superior to feminism? I've already proven that feminism helps people of every gender, class and race. The only people I can imagine who would consider being against feminism would be people who know nothing about feminism at all. If you really want to go down the "MRAs vs. Feminism" road: Give me a sales pitch for Men's Rights Activism without mentioning feminism. Assume I'm a prospective activist, but I'm on the fence about the two movements. If the only thing your version of the Men's Rights Movement has going for it is that it's not feminism--despite having pretty much the same goals--what's the point? What do MRAs do or try to do for men of color? LGBTQ men? Abused men? Male victims of sexual violence? Male victims of abuse? If feminism helps all of these groups, what is the point of MRAs struggling against it? Aren't they only hindering men?

Checking Santa's Privilege

Official government surveys showed that women commit a great amount of domestic abuse, also there are official surveys that show that women specifically mothers hold the majority in abuse against children, but of course feminists never talk about that because it undermines their propaganda of making women look superior to men. I care about men's rights otherwise I would be a white knight believing everything that the feminist movement told me. I fully support father's rights and have plenty of proof of how terrible the custody courts are and how divorce and child support can literally take away all of a man's money and not be allowed to see his kids.

@The Patriarch

Look guy, all you're doing is inaccurately defining the majority of feminism and listing off problems in society that feminists seek to rectify. Just because their movement focuses on women doesn't mean that they believe women should be superior or that we should all ignore men's problems completely. Look here, it has plenty of links to sources. Also here. And here. And here too.

@Robeatics

But the fact is you can't seem to handle the idea of critics of feminism, that's why people view it like a religion

@The Patriarch

I can handle criticism when it isn't based around false information and assumption. I want to clear up the misconceptions, which I hope I did here.

Why Women (And Feminism) Suck

Holy shit, someone actually took this seriously. If you can't laugh at the article, laugh at the fucktards who actually believe this stuff. Their desperate insecurity and the resultant half-self-loathing, half-self-centred narcissism they all exhibit is fucking hilarious.

@Halo

Two parts laughter, one part disgust and one part pity for all the fantastic women they will miss out on having in their lives.

Why Women (And Feminism) Suck

To clear up any potential confusion, I don't actually agree with the superiority of the patriarchy, I just found the article funny.

@Hank

I disagree on the funny part (it jabs some sore spots), but to be honest I wish it could be said that everyone reading that article also took it as something stupid and flimsy. Blegh.

Is there anyone left who cares about Magic: The Gathering?

I had to quit to save what little hair I had left after ripping most of it out. Screw blue decks.

Why Women (And Feminism) Suck

That is a very valid interpretation, but by the author posting it up on a fervently anti-feminist website filled with men who insist womens' struggles don't exist sort of makes it more like a parody of anti-feminist parodies in that it means everything it says. Just read the comments.

@Robeatics

I deliberately didn't.

@Hank

I wish I'd done the same, to be honest. </swordwave>

Why Women (And Feminism) Suck

Don't yell at me, I'm just the messenger.

@Hank

But are you actually trying to prove anything or are you just trying to work people up? If it's the former then you've got a pathetically lacking source.

@Robeatics

It's a satirical article, but clearly too subtle for you.

@Hank

Satire still wants to prove a point. If you think the author isn't on one level or another trying to say that he thinks women would never function in a manless society then you need to review the definition of satire.

@Robeatics

It's what he's superficially saying but I doubt that it's the true point of the article. Have you read the little author synopsis to the left of the article? I interpreted the whole thing as lancing the dragon ("making fun of" -- Dutch proverbs are weird) with men trying to prove the patriarchy is superior based on evidence as flimsy as this.

@Hank

That is a very valid interpretation, but by the author posting it up on a fervently anti-feminist website filled with men who insist womens' struggles don't exist sort of makes it more like a parody of anti-feminist parodies in that it means everything it says. Just read the comments. Jesus, I'm gonna get a headache. This article is to misogyny what Bloodwulf is to 80s ultraviolence.