• Last Seen: 11 yrs ago
  • Joined: 12 yrs ago
  • Posts: 2579 (0.58 / day)
  • VMs: 0
  • Username history
    1. So Boerd 12 yrs ago

Status

User has no status, yet

Bio

User has no bio, yet

Most Recent Posts

As long as the plane isn't deleteriously impacted, I guess I don't mind. We have yet to have an argument start because someone could lift too much though.
LeeRoy said
The current state of affairs.Example: The status quo of North Korea is absolute despair and filth due to the Kim dynasty sucking at being good rulers.


Punk. :P I meant what is the current lift limit situation
What is status quo?
I am a vote yes.
Leeroy, Sukoh is 32 feet long, right?
So basically, Earth is made to make us transition. The more costly the source of oil we have to use, the more attractive feasible renewable energy becomes. Oil will effectively price itself out, so we don't need to freak out. Once nuclear/hydro/geothermal become cheaper than oil, there will be a mass transition to those sources without the need for government to funnel money to rich corporate donors--I mean, "invest in renewable energy."
To clarify, if Teflon gets an exemption, my vote is yeah.
Going to have to say no. Its engines can accelerate at 100 meters per second (in the atmosphere. In space, it can accelerate much faster), and it weighs 256 tons.

Meaning it could, hypothetically, beat gravity and climb at one meter per second squared with around 2,200 tons. Hypothetically, although he never, ever, ever, would, and it would be downright idiotic in combat since it would take forever to move, it is technically possible. So I would ask for a specific exemption for him, knowing and promising that his plane would never lift even close to 500 tons.
I have to do math first, then I can tell you.
Right. By all means, if people want to voluntarily invest in renewable energy, go ahead. If a company wants to build this environmentally neutral pipeline, go ahead. Just no government force.
© 2007-2026
BBCode Cheatsheet