Mhmm. Thank you.
This turn and the next are going to be very interesting.
The Nexerus
Member
Sui generis
- Last Seen: 4 yrs ago
- Joined: 12 yrs ago
- Posts: 4060 (0.89 / day)
- VMs: 5
-
Username history
- The Nexerus 12 yrs ago
Status
User has no status, yet
Bio
User has no bio, yet
Most Recent Posts
I referred to the Belgian ruling class as Frenchmen, because they're closely political and socially connected to France, were put into their position at the top of Belgian society as a result of French intervention, and are Francophone.
I did not refer to Belgium as a French province, like you did.
I did not refer to Belgium as a French province, like you did.
Lucian said If somebody makes a CS for a God that's similar to yours, but better, or more well put together, I'll be picking theirs. Just keep that in mind.
I didn't read his mind, I read his post.
Could you please show me in which post it was that the Netherlands stated IC that Belgium is a French province?
Ottomans said The Netherlands claims that the French and Belgians would never have agreed to surrender Flanders to the Netherlands. We would like to point out that the only nation in Europe which has willingly made territorial concessions for the sake of peace has been France, which surrendered Alsace-Lorraine to the German Confederation. The Netherlands’ claim that only military force could result in Flanders being transferred to the Netherlands is thus baseless and unfounded. If anything, France has proven it is more than willing to concede land for the sake of peace. However, those who wish for war need no excuse, and the fact such an excuse was made goes only to show the level of moral degeneration of the aggressors.
Somebody needs to tell the Ottomans that Belgium isn't in France.
Raineh Daze said
So... who gets to play what is determined not by who first showed interest, but by who can scrape something together as soon as possible after the OOC is put up, despite potentially not even being on at the time? ... why?
That is not at all what he said.
Whether you posted either here or in the OOC first is irrelevant. It is the quality of your God's CS that he will be judging, not what time you happened to be online.
And in the case that you recognize the invasion of Belgium as 'warmongering', would it then not be Prussia's responsibility to intervene and mediate the conflict? I suspect that your problem is with the nature of their mediation, in which case you should be upset that the Treaty of Constantinople, which you signed, did not specify what precisely the neutral mediators responsibilities were.
In either case, I have the utmost confidence that the ToC signatories will accept Prussia's decision on how to arbitrate the newest conflict in Northern Europe.
In either case, I have the utmost confidence that the ToC signatories will accept Prussia's decision on how to arbitrate the newest conflict in Northern Europe.
You don't consider Dutch troops advancing into the captured portion of their country and being fired upon by a foreign military to be a conflict, Ampharos?
Pasta Sentient said
Eh. This will all play out ICly anyways.
I completely agree.
Austria /does/ seem rather hostile to German territorial integrity. Perhaps they'd rather have solved the situation by handing Leopold I a few train-loads of Austrian princesses to convince him to stop fighting. Mind you, at least that would have kept him from running to Paris and preventing any possibility of a peace agreement.
© 2007-2026