The Nexerus

World in Revolution: 1861

Ampharos said Like, holy hell. Some of you people need to go outside or something because this is no way that a normal person interacts with the world.

Care to give an example of precisely what's been said that you don't agree with the tone of?

If you've never ran into someone calling someone else stupid, YOU need to get out more.

World in Revolution: 1861

Pasta, I agree with your interpretation of the rule. Our opinions differer when it comes to what things we consider would make sense in real life.

World in Revolution: 1861

Pasta Sentient said
Nex... You cannot simply accept a statement.

Not when it's wrong.

@Rare: This isn't about Victoria. I am glad that situation was resolved, and I don't have anything else to say about it.

World in Revolution: 1861

If people made more realistic decisions there would be less overall for Outcast to do, not more.

World in Revolution: 1861

bigscreech said
I threw it out there just to state that there is no point in nit picking as this rp long deviated from the proper historicaltimeline and am asserting it is pointless to nitpick on history as we know it as it is an alternative history and damn near anything can happen.

I fundamentally disagree. The fact that unrealistic decisions have been made in the past makes it more necessary to make realistic decisions in the future, to avoid the roleplay falling further and further out of the realm of sanity. When you leave your door unlocked and someone breaks into your house at night and steals your TV, the logical response isn't to leave your door open the next night and let the burglars take what they wish. The logical response is to lock your damn doors next time.

World in Revolution: 1861

I am happy to let Victoria die, hence why I didn't bring it up. Bigscreech intended to use Victoria as a benchmark to assess whether something in this roleplay is realistic or not. I corrected his use of it as a benchmark.

It's illogical to say, "Well, this is wrong, but someone's done worse before, so it's okay".

World in Revolution: 1861

Ampharos said Are we really bringing this up again?Sure, it was stupid. Yes, Pasta made a mistake, yes, everyone acknowledged it, but shit, do we really have to rehash this ? Like, every single day?

I wasn't the one to bring it up. Did you skip past the post I was responding to? If you feel the need to be the guardian of Pasta's feelings, get upset at bigscreech.

To Lund ap Lunds [ Early Middle Ages NRP | IntChk and Sign-Ups ]

Are the values for fiefdoms and taxes and units and such the same, or vastly different? I'm assuming I can't just import my sheet from the other thread.

Either I own too much junk, or my house is too small.

Derpestein said
I wonder if the doctor will ever be a ginger.

I would bet a large amount of money that within our lifetimes there will be a female doctor, a black doctor, an LGBT doctor AND a ginger doctor.

Maybe they'll mush it all together, make the next doctor a black woman with freckles, red hair and a taste for other ladies.

World in Revolution: 1861

^ The Victoria situation had to be covered up with a big bandaged labelled, "She was insane all along!". It WAS completely ridiculous, and everyone acknowledged it.

This isn't a fantasy roleplay where we throw reality out the window and rewrite our country's names and histories to suit our preferences.

solamelike said
You mean the 8th Coalition still thinking they can win and not giving up yet?

There has been exactly two major battles, one a victory for the Eighth Coalition and one a loss. We've lost no territory whatsoever. It'd be unrealistic if we did all start surrendering.