Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Giygas
Raw
OP

Giygas

Member Seen 9 yrs ago

Why aren't there any animals in pokemon? I never really thought about it until the which pokemon would you be thread. You never see a cat or a rabbit or anything. Do they just not exist?
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Shy
Raw

Shy

Member Seen 5 yrs ago

Giygas said
Why aren't there any animals in pokemon? I never really thought about it until the which pokemon would you be thread. You never see a cat or a rabbit or anything. Do they just not exist?


Nope. Pokemon are the animals. It why you see spearow flying around in flocks and most families having things like delcatty and growlithe as pets.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Overwatch
Raw
Avatar of Overwatch

Overwatch The Lord of Black Flames

Member Seen 4 yrs ago

*cough*Skitty/purguly/glameow/etc*cough*Lopbunny/digersby*cough*
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Lady Squee
Raw
Avatar of Lady Squee

Lady Squee Loyal Lannister

Member Seen 5 yrs ago

Beep
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by BrobyDDark
Raw
Avatar of BrobyDDark

BrobyDDark Gentleman Spidey

Member Seen 2 yrs ago

Thing is, Pokemon are animals. Just like real life, you can keep pretty much anything as a pet and you can also go outside, kill, and eat anything you want. It works out.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Dervish
Raw
Avatar of Dervish

Dervish Let's get volatile

Member Seen 11 mos ago

Pokemon are the animals, the end.

There's also an interesting theory that people are Pokemon too, but that's another tale.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by natsumehack
Raw

natsumehack

Banned Offline since relaunch

Dervish said
Pokemon are the animals, the end.There's also an interesting theory that people are Pokemon too, but that's another tale.


Let's not get into that or else we be discussing the pokemon marrying humans.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Kaga
Raw
Avatar of Kaga

Kaga just passing through

Member Seen 7 yrs ago

Lady Squee said



Yeah, this.

I always interpreted the Pokemon canon as having real-world animals which the Pokemon lived alongside, at least in the earlier days of the franchise. Trouble was, real-world animals were hardly focused on, because, well... it only makes sense to focus on the Pokemon. There was really no good way to work them into the early games and, while some of the early cards featured real animals in the background, the anime never had much of a reason to focus on any real animals.

But then they started making more Pokemon species, and they realized that, even in the early episodes, real animals were hardly seen, so they sort of replaced more animals with Pokemon and sort of changed the canon so that all the animals were Pokemon, even if that wasn't originally the idea.

...Or at least, that's how I see it.

It's kind of like how the early games (and I think maybe a few episodes of the anime) implied that the Pokemon series takes place in the real world by referencing real-world places. But, again, only the early games ever featured such hints. For all we know, maybe that was the original idea (all the regions are based off of real-world places, after all), but then the Pokemon world expanded and took on more of its own identity so they cleaned up the canon and took out any ambiguity on that front. As much as I love the Pokemon franchise, I feel like their efforts at putting together an established canon were pretty sloppy in the early days. Seems like not even all the people working on the series were all on the same page on such matters.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Dervish
Raw
Avatar of Dervish

Dervish Let's get volatile

Member Seen 11 mos ago

natsumehack said
Let's not get into that or else we be discussing the pokemon marrying humans.


That would be like somebody trying to marry an ocelot or a pelican or some other random animal. Ain't gonna happen.

The weirdo fetishists can go fuck themselves, however.
↑ Top
© 2007-2024
BBCode Cheatsheet