Avatar of Gwazi Magnum
  • Last Seen: 8 yrs ago
  • Old Guild Username: Gwazi Magnum
  • Joined: 12 yrs ago
  • Posts: 32489 (7.16 / day)
  • VMs: 0
  • Username history
    1. Gwazi Magnum 12 yrs ago
  • Latest 10 profile visitors:

Status

Recent Statuses

9 yrs ago
Current :magnum:
1 like
11 yrs ago
PRAISE THE SUN!!!
11 yrs ago
Note to self, enter = post.
11 yrs ago
Apparently these are a thing.

Bio

You followed me all the way to my Bio? Well... Now we must drop it.

Most Recent Posts

That, actually isn't that bizarre (at least compared to most Henry things... Maybe I'm just not grasping the bizarreness of this cause I haven't seen this 'smile' myself).

A lot of people (Me included) can't force fake smiles, it requires the actual feeling to be there.
Henry's just sounds like a more extreme version of one with a bad fake smile. Maybe she's trying too hard?
Maybe that's just how her personality compensates for a smile when the natural happiness isn't there?
This is my bored PM spree all over again...
Glad people liked it! XD

Thankfully, the work that tends to pile up end year get's followed by a lot of time off.
So it's sort of a "Panic now, relax later" sort of trade.
In What The Fuck 12 yrs ago Forum: Spam Forum
Clearly you're a site update made manifest.
The ratbug being a rather large creature had to have left some footsteps when he ran off. Gwazi checked the ground quickly and noticed the tracks "If we follow these we should be able to find him soon, and wounded since we literally just fought him". But then started running off in the direction of the tracks, without really waiting for the others to follow.
Am I the only one not frantically juggling things in RL atm? :/

Good luck, here's a song to cheer you up. :)

If you're the shit poster does that make me the Green shit poster?
This is my favourite thread ever.
Peach rings are the best :3
Ok, there seems to have been a few misunderstanding here.

Gia said you can’t be an operator/admin on the IRC if you already have Guildside powers.OK. Check.


I didn't mean "We can't have the same admins/mods here be incharge there".
I meant it needs to strictly be a community, that any strong presence of moderation could very easily lead to more bannings or controlling than anything else.
I've seen many conversations on the Guild stifled because either an Admin or Mod didn't like it, or because someone else didn't and then asked an Admin or Mod to close it on everyone else.

And every community I've seen do this has lost activity over time as a result, because people were to afraid to talk fully openly, or about certain topics.
But in communities where admins and mods didn't tend to do that, activity would flourish because we felt more bonded and close as an open and honest community.
Not one where people need to watch what they say or they'd get in trouble.

Gia said By suggesting that you need to have a chat that’s all RP all the time, you’re essentially dictating a conversation you won’t always be a part of, with the expectation that someone will always be able to pick up the thread and run with it, so to speak.


When I said "Encourage community and involvement", I meant encouraging the site community to interact and get along with more of each other.
I did not mean that it should all be focused on roleplaying.

+I wasn't trying to suggest there should be hard rules to enforce it either (in fact I specifically spoke against that).
What I was suggesting was we should try to nudge people in one direction, try to persuade people to making a closer community rather than a cliche. Not to outright force them.

Gia said Now, regarding your ban.


I should have elaborated.

When I said "I'd rather not turn this thread into a "X Mod is a prick!" I should have said "I'd rather we stay on topic, and not derail this about one banning".
I brought the case up as an example to show what I was detailing above, where such things can happen, community get's stiffled.
+I even said "May it be for personal reasons or Guld Regulation reasons". So I never even argued that it may not have been justified.

But, incase you do insist on arguing this I'm doing to start work on a longer/more detailed reply of this now through PM.
So as to not derail/lose focus on this thread. May I be in the wrong or not, it wasn't meant to be the main topic of this thread.
And I've been on OT long enough to know if this debate get's it's wheels turning in this thread, it's original point will be lost.

Edit: So, in the PM thing i was given a link to the logs of the case itself here.
Note, I'm not posting this to get a debate going. I'm posting it just incase people see moving it to PM as trying to dodge the bullet.
With this link, you can look at it yourself, make your own opinion and decide if I was in the wrong or not. Once again don't make this a 'debate this ban' thread.
This is just so you people aren't left in the dark of what's being referenced as a result of me taking it to PM.
© 2007-2026
BBCode Cheatsheet