Hellis Member
Cᴀɴɴɪʙᴀʟɪsᴛɪᴄ Yᴇᴛ Cʟᴀssʏ
STATUS: Hey y'all. I am about to start working on a webcomic and try to draw for a living now. 7 yrs ago
ciderStatus
Recent Statuses
7 yrs ago
Current
Hey y'all. I am about to start working on a webcomic and try to draw for a living now.
6
likes
9 yrs ago
Oh no. The World Ending library has started to smell of lemon again. Nobody likes dying to the smell of citrus
2
likes
Bio
"Always tenderize the meat first."
Most Recent Posts
post on the way. I promise!
http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2014/09/08/videogames-are-for-everybody/#more-232091
This is probably the best formulated retort to the whole thing I've read so far.
This is probably the best formulated retort to the whole thing I've read so far.
http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2014/09/08/videogames-are-for-everybody/#more-232091
This is probably the best formulated retort to the whole thing I've read so far.
This is probably the best formulated retort to the whole thing I've read so far.
ello?
It's bullshit. Gene is a self absorbed little prick.
Nothing of what you said I did correlate to the description of the word Passive agressive that you provided. I am actively critizing and commenting.
-
http://www.examiner.com/article/gamergate-revealed-as-misogynist-and-racist-movement-from-4chan
Not really suprised, that a 4chan driven movements have elements of racism and misogony in it. What I find interesting is the fact that there are no proof what so ever about Quinn sleeping with the kotaku guy for reviews becouse he never did reviews of her games. Or proper proof for kotaku being the terrible liars that Magnum has been calling them out on. No, a angry ex does not the same as definite proof. Especially since it got redacted.
-
http://www.examiner.com/article/gamergate-revealed-as-misogynist-and-racist-movement-from-4chan
Not really suprised, that a 4chan driven movements have elements of racism and misogony in it. What I find interesting is the fact that there are no proof what so ever about Quinn sleeping with the kotaku guy for reviews becouse he never did reviews of her games. Or proper proof for kotaku being the terrible liars that Magnum has been calling them out on. No, a angry ex does not the same as definite proof. Especially since it got redacted.
Indeed it is!
No.
I see you still stick to the whole "Summarize points in the most patronizing way possible" trick. And adding personal attack by claiming i am being passive aggressive. Good golly sir, you fit right in with a MSNBC panel. Let me pay you one back shall I?
protip^ This is called snark, possibly sass. What you display is a form of elitism, trying to patronize whoever argues with you by reducing qoutes to snippets that is meant to highlight some percieved notion of inferiority such as "obvius stuff about gamer culture".
Magic; No. Just No. They showed images of the launch, it was a wasteland. They had videos of it in other coverage. They are in that regard as credible as they can get. Kotaku is also a blog based site, alot of the writers are freelance or work independant from one another. You yourself say its obvius in regards to what they are covering (consoles), yet you tried to contrive it into being part of the whole "gamer is dead" coverage. They lied (please provide a proper article/reference material about this by the wayl) about things completely unrelated to the xbox ones Japanese launch. You can backpedal all you want, it doesn't change the way presented it or tried to shohorn it into a different discussion.
All that "Obvius" stuff about gaming culture? Extremely relavant to the subject at hand as it's been linked to misogony accusations and sensationalism drivel. Gaming culture has a massive problem about exclusivity, and the gaming industry suffer from alot of heavy catering to certein demographics. So its relavant, to the topic of the thread. You don't get to wave it off. You don't have a point. Kotaku may have been dishonest in their coverage of something, they may simply have acted on lacking information. You do not know that. YOu assume, the way the very ones we critize right this moment assumed and waved their virtual pitchforks around. It was by a different person, writing a different kind of blog regarding a entirely different subject.
Passive agressive? You might wanna look up what that word means before you toss it at somebody.
I see you still stick to the whole "Summarize points in the most patronizing way possible" trick. And adding personal attack by claiming i am being passive aggressive. Good golly sir, you fit right in with a MSNBC panel. Let me pay you one back shall I?
protip^ This is called snark, possibly sass. What you display is a form of elitism, trying to patronize whoever argues with you by reducing qoutes to snippets that is meant to highlight some percieved notion of inferiority such as "obvius stuff about gamer culture".
Magic Magnum said Blatant disregarding your own qoutes.
Magic; No. Just No. They showed images of the launch, it was a wasteland. They had videos of it in other coverage. They are in that regard as credible as they can get. Kotaku is also a blog based site, alot of the writers are freelance or work independant from one another. You yourself say its obvius in regards to what they are covering (consoles), yet you tried to contrive it into being part of the whole "gamer is dead" coverage. They lied (please provide a proper article/reference material about this by the wayl) about things completely unrelated to the xbox ones Japanese launch. You can backpedal all you want, it doesn't change the way presented it or tried to shohorn it into a different discussion.
All that "Obvius" stuff about gaming culture? Extremely relavant to the subject at hand as it's been linked to misogony accusations and sensationalism drivel. Gaming culture has a massive problem about exclusivity, and the gaming industry suffer from alot of heavy catering to certein demographics. So its relavant, to the topic of the thread. You don't get to wave it off. You don't have a point. Kotaku may have been dishonest in their coverage of something, they may simply have acted on lacking information. You do not know that. YOu assume, the way the very ones we critize right this moment assumed and waved their virtual pitchforks around. It was by a different person, writing a different kind of blog regarding a entirely different subject.
Passive agressive? You might wanna look up what that word means before you toss it at somebody.
I don't think you have to fear any large scale attacks or anything. Mexico is known for its christian faith, not Islamic ones. The amount of recruiting there would be limited at best. Isis is busy fighting where they have substantial support. Usborder is also alot harder to hop then say, Syriak/Iraqian one.
© 2007-2026