Goldmarble said
......The fuck? Hell no.That would mean I would actually have to look through threads that, just by the fucking title, I ignore on instinct.I would actually have to read each, and every goddamn one of Nat's posts (Not that they're bad, just so fucking many).I would actually have to read each, and every goddamn one of Broby's posts (Not that there's that many, just that they're all so stupid and he'll probably need a ban sometime)Fuck you Jorick, and the horse you rode in on.

Doivid said
That's plausible but honestly what I know of him, he's a little bitch for technicalities and will adhere to rules when it's practical (WOTM, general behavior outside spam) and I feel like the whole power hungry angle is 'below' him, if you know what I mean. smug little shit.

Doivid said
I guess it is more about law than good or bad with him, but show!stannis did let Davos do a lot of stuff as his 'conscience' so he can't be all neutral.
Doivid said
what if nat gets so heavily parodied and copied that he sinks into the background and loses effectiveness.
Raxacoricofallapatorius said
Jorick is pretty level-headed and (usually) a good judge of character. I'd vote for him.(Even though there's always the chance that power would corrupt his heart--if he has one--and we'd all be doomed except for maybe Sherlock)
Doivid said
Jorick, according to his own words, would be more like an eager Stannis, not really a Joffrey, given modship.I bet I don't even have to explain what that entails. geeks.
Sherlock Holmes said
'Til I get back from the movies tomorrow night. (So, a bit less than 24 hours. Not terrible.)
Guru said
I might just 'Accidentally' click the ban button for you. Don't worry... purely accidental. And I reckon, I won't notice for a few days.

Guru said
It's a surprise.
