Avatar of KnightShade
  • Last Seen: 6 yrs ago
  • Joined: 12 yrs ago
  • Posts: 966 (0.21 / day)
  • VMs: 0
  • Username history
    1. KnightShade 12 yrs ago

Status

Recent Statuses

10 yrs ago
'cholp cholp cholp URRMG. This If Fmafhing...'
10 yrs ago
Am I Not Pretty Enough?
1 like
11 yrs ago
Aw geez, here we go again
11 yrs ago
Krysten Ritter is my spirit animal.
1 like
11 yrs ago
bye?

Bio

User has no bio, yet

Most Recent Posts

matthew.farrell70
Ooh, could we watch some of the godzila cartoons or maybe some Daria. Or there's the Dorlock Holmes thing by looney toons which could be funny with the proper holmes ones.
Oh right, I voted.
Doivid said 72. Do you support its opening?


Halo said
I feel like prioritising friendships/importance based on Rihanna songs is an awfully, horrendously, superfluous-adverbly terrible idea.




Better
Drakel said I don't completely argue with you, you're right on many levels and as I said it all depends on what type of variables that we are using. So neither of us are right or wrong unless we are looking at specific variables. So in the end it's all good Knight. :)


Goddamit Drakel! We were supposed to be agreeing to disagree not agreeing to agree. Now I have to disagree to disagree while you get to agree to agree. Fuck you, you reasonable asshole.
I reeeeaaaally wanna know!
Doivid said
Who are any of us, really? Dialectically and subliminally, that is. What is our true identification?


I'm currently a bunch of neurons lighting up to ponder this for instant gratification in my chimp brain, while another bunch of neurons which are currently less so me light up guiltily about the work I'm supposed to be doing for tomorrow's exam. Okay, now I'm mostly the guilty neurons.
Drakel said
Okay, but what I'm saying is that the majority doesn't do that, in fact that doesn't happen at all. What I'm saying is that those who declare themselves as Nat are just doing it out of randumbness after seeing multiple nat threads and since nobody is hating on nat anymore (because it's so fucking pointless and old) they get the mindset that it's okay and thus they begin thinking that it's okay until everyone slaps them around a bit for it. Maybe the way I worded that made little sense though in all honesty it makes perfect sense. It's a fucking randumb member playing "Monkey see, Monkey do". Nothing more, nothing less. THAT is what I'm talking about knight. You're talking about something different.


I understand more what you mean now, the logical leap that eludes me is them deciding there is something about Nat alone that warrants them declaring they are like him. Randumb people in a vacuum with whatever it is Nat does, I see them as more just acting like him in that scenario than drawing conscious similarities. And we are both talking about how new people come to associate themselves primarily with Nat, I think.

I really don't want to argue with you though Drakel, I don't mind about getting the last word in so you can do that if you like, so long as we can agree to disagree on it.

Raxacoricofallapatorius said Nat's 4 real voice


Mummy.
Drakel said Actually that sum wasn't called to be Nat by spammers, They just came in out of the blue and declared themselves it. This is a result of them looking in spam and seeing nothing but threads made by nat instead of other spammers and in turn that gives them the idea that this community is, in fact a bunch of Nats, only for them to find out later that it is not.


That makes no sense. So they come into spam and assume everyone is exactly like Nat which would mean he has no distinct personality, then they declare themselves the 'New Nat' implying he has something distinct to imitate. What I'm arguing isn't trying to place blame on either side, but the way I see it is: New person comes in and doesn't know how to behave so does something stupid > Everyone laments there stupidity including a comparison to Nat (that isn't necessarily the new Nat, but might just be something like they're worse than him) > If the person changes their behavior they'd see it as admitting they are wrong, so instead they embrace comparisons to Nat.

K-97 said
I'm sorry since when was I an elephant? I literally changed my name just so I wouldn't be associated with KB.


I like saying someone is no longer an elephant when spam agrees to ignore them, like the bit in Dumbo. And, I was going to go with K3BO but that seemed a bit harsh. If it helps I do see you as a distinct individual and it's meant jokingly, I wouldn't put you in my signature if I didn't have some measure of respect for you as well as awe at the foolishness of that part of your comment.
© 2007-2026
BBCode Cheatsheet