ML Member

I'm interested in the idea of a Greek Gods world that doesn't have the Percy Jackson universe. It seems like a cool concept, but Rick Riordan kind of cornered the market on that whole deal in terms of writing novels. That or the Miracle one are interesting. I gotta run now but if you could send me a PM that I could look at when I get back that would be super chill of you thanks :) oh and jumper sounds cool but i havent seen the movie so i wouldnt want to butcher anything

That's super great Oh btw who are the people that are helpin you with the site? Do you have like a Code Crew

Random idea here, but what's the chance of a search bar at some point?

hello

Mahz I am going to make a picture in your honor It will have fire and dragons and unicorns and all manner of things ok

No qq code is the devil

> > With this roster and with this occasion, it feels like it's exactly one year ago again. Maybe we can just pretend last year never happened. > > Last year saw much of the old-timers migrate to other forums as well and activity has declined significantly. We can pretend, but it won't be the same. Let's just see it as a good opportunity for a fresh start. All that means is that a new round of elders is going to start cropping up. If the site gets awesomeagain it might prompt some of them to come back As long as progress keeps bein made, who knows wha might happen

> > > With the thread/page titles once more popping up in browser tabs (instead of just "roleplayer guild")... Is it intentional that it says, for example, "Topic: Mahz's Dev Journal - Roleplayer Guild" rather than "Mahz's Dev Journal - Roleplayer Guild"? Or is that a sneaky bit of uncooperative code? > > > > I assume it might be intentional. I, however, did think that I should perhaps suggest that the "Topic:", "Convo:", etc prefixes be done away with, since the first six letters of a topic title tend to be more informative than just whether it is a topic, PM-conversation or forum view. > > Yall think the context is unnecessary/extraneous? I'll do away with it. > > In other news, I've been pleased with this editor: <http://imperavi.com/redactor/>. I have it working on my local machine and have re-implemented the Save/Cancel edit system seen on the current Markdown editor. > > If I go that route: > > - I'll be able to store HTML directly in the database. There will be no client-side rendering necessary, so no more jarring "pop in" posts. The front-end will be responsive since it's just an HTML dump. No post-processing. > - I'll render all current Markdown posts to HTML (when I deploy the new editor) and they will then be editable with the editor. That should be a seamless change. Then I'll remove the Markdown system. > - The path to making legacy (pre-relaunch posts) editable again will the be obvious since the editor can just load their HTML. > > I'll push it to the dev server when I'm done to get some feedback. > > It not easy to find the middle ground between WYSIWYG clusterfuck and editing markup by hand with no help, but this editor is actually easy for me to work with. Mahz you r the legit best ever, good job

This is great that so much stuff is happening, but I hope you're not trying to do too much at once, Mahz. Maybe take it one step at a time? I know that I burn out when I have too much to do, and this is too important for that to happen with you pls dont kill self

> (Subscribed) tags no longer exist next to thread titles in forum view; that was a feature I myself found somewhat convenient as a visual identifier. > > > > So, Mahz, [this](http://puu.sh/e0BLJ.jpg) is what was being circulated as to what the new guild would look like. Just wondering if you actually sent this in the IRC. > > > Totally, it's so pretty > > Excluding the white text on orange/red/green background. That should be black. And the white text on the near-black background should be silver. Else it's eye-strain. Agreed. Also, it doesn't matter how pretty it is if it isn't as functional or better than the Guild is now. but im sure mahz knew that please do not kill me