Pepperm1nts

World in Revolution: 1900

I've shorten it to four, very thin "paragraphs". There is just no way to specify what I want with a single paragraph, or even two. It's not that much, honestly. You can read it all pretty quick, so it's not like I'm writing down a wall-of-text. Honestly, I think you'd be fine with it. Unless you have the attention span of a dead squirrel. But I doubt you do considering you took on the task of running this RP and haven't bailed on us yet.

World in Revolution: 1861

You know damn well what happened, you damn limey.

World in Revolution: 1900

You're such a damn grouch.

*goes to shorten order some more*

World in Revolution: 1900

Oh boy. I expect Dutch will ask me to cut back then. A lot of it is really just a bunch of filler, but still. The rest of the orders are single paragraphs though.

EDIT: I trimmed down the paragraphs a bit.

World in Revolution: 1900

I thought his Italians were just having trouble grasping the concept of trains, or something like that.

Also: I hope long orders aren't an issue. My national focus order is about five paragraphs long. Hopefully you guys like it when people are specific, 'cause I felt I had to be in-depth with what I wanted.

World in Revolution: 1861

I don't know what I'd like to play as. Maybe Sweden if Ded is willing to give it up. But I don't know.

World in Revolution: 1900

Unless there are walls in the way. Apparently those are my army's Kryptonite. When they catch a glimpse of a wall they completely forget their training and go from a respectable, capable and competent military force, to a bunch of headless chickens with no sense of direction.

Seriously, it bugs me that they 'got lost' at Peking. I would have preferred almost anything else. "They got pinned down.", "Being a small force, they played a supportive role alongside the Germans.", "The Austrians eventually got through their gate, but the small force found itself overwhelmed by the sprawling city on the other side and failed to locate their objective." or hell.. even "Having encountered a lot of resistance, the small Austrian force was the last through the gates, having pushed through only after the pressure was taken off of them by other contingents on the other side of the walls."

But noep. "They got lost." It sounds like they're a bunch of incompetent morons, which they most definitely aren't. I feel like whoever wrote the update read the Wikipedia page and wrote down everyone's role based on RL, but since he didn't find anything about Austria in the article, he decided to just throw Austria under the buss with a simple "They got lost."

I ain't mad though. Really, I AIN'T MAD. Just sad.

*cries*

World in Revolution: 1861

American Revolution period would be cool.

EDIT: Got ninja'd. But still.. new period is my vote. But I'd probably be game either way.

World in Revolution: 1861

@Boerd: Doesn't change that we'd all be trying to do the same thing. Maybe things may not be as successful for you the second time around, but you'd still be trying to do the same thing. Seems really exhausting to me. Like I said, I'd prefer that energy be put to something new and interesting.

World in Revolution: 1861

Starting over sounds so exhausting though. We'd be doing the same series of posts. Prussia would do the same thing (unite Germany), and in turn, so would Austria (try to prevent German unification). We'd be playing the same thing all over again, putting out very similar posts. I'd rather spend my energy doing something different. I'd prefer we just do a different timeline.