Avatar of Rina
  • Last Seen: 2 yrs ago
  • Old Guild Username: Kirra
  • Joined: 12 yrs ago
  • Posts: 1733 (0.38 / day)
  • VMs: 4
  • Username history
    1. Rina 6 yrs ago
    2. █████ 12 yrs ago
  • Latest 10 profile visitors:

Status

Recent Statuses

6 yrs ago
Current Huh, has it really been three years since my last post? I guess I’m back at least to lurk around.
4 likes
11 yrs ago
Dear life, I was told to get one but you are killing me. Can I get a refund on the extra hours at work and the lack of sleep for a bit of freetime. Yours dearly, The Coffeeholic
11 yrs ago
Sleep? You mean there is a such thing called a regular sleep schedule?

Bio

RP Status: Full. I'd be open to chatting but I'm currently not accepting any new RPs.

After a three year hiatus I’m back and with a new username.

  • I joined the Guild in the summer of 2011
  • I enjoy gardening, hiking, cooking and listening to podcasts (if you have any podcast suggestions send them my way)
  • I have a huge interest in roleplays where I can really dive into the psychological side of my characters but not a fan of romance based roleplays


If you want to know more about me or want to chat, feel free to PM me. I'm always up to meeting new people.

Most Recent Posts

Wow, take care of yourself okay. Don't feel guilty of having to step down, I understand. If at anytime at all you want to start this up again or something new in the future (maybe we can even Co-GM it so that the pressure is off of you) or even a 1x1, feel free to contact me. I've enjoyed reading your blog so I'll make sure to keep an eye on your blog for what is in store for it in the future! Stay safe and stay healthy. My Skype and my PMs are always open if you ever want to chat or get something rolling.

This has been the longest running roleplay I have been in and have enjoyed roleplaying with all of you. If we want to continue, restart or even do something completely different with each other I am all for it. I am already busy GMing a roleplay but if need be I can step up or seeing that we are all pretty trustworthy and responsible people, we could also make it into more of a team effort instead of a focal GM and come up with the plot and such and progressing things together. Although I personally haven't been in a group that has done it, I've seen it work well with other people. All in all, I am fine going in any direction the rest of you are wanting to do so.
Lillian Thorne said
I've even handed control of a few of them over to players who acted as co-GMs a time or two in the infancy of my GMing.

I've tried this out for the first time in the roleplay I'm running and so far it has worked wonderfully. It helps take off the load of keeping track of all the NPCs as well as let certain NPCs be played in a different manner.

Lillian Thorne said
Then there are the ones that are a little more cardboard-y. The baker who is around the corner who warrants a name but not much more. I make lists of these so that there is coherency and that if for whatever reason the baker needs to become more important we know a name and some little things about them.

I'll have to keep that in mind. I've done this with more important NPCs but adding to the list with names and short blurbs of who they are a minor NPC is would come in handy granted that I have a ton of NPCs in that roleplay so I'll probably have to find a way to somehow limit it.

Lord Wraith said
Sometimes I even write whole posts from the perspective of the NPC, it's fun sometimes to describe your character through someone else's eyes. That said I predominately play Superhuman RPs and thus this all works very well for that particular genre.

With a decent chunk of the first part of the roleplay focused on uncovering the NPC's past, I have done this (maybe a little too much) so that the roleplayers can learn about what is going on or what is to come. From what I've seen it's been a great way to set the mood of a roleplay or an arc.

Arsenal said
I never really put much thought into NPCs; usually I operated under the "name/nameless" rules for NPCs. In general, if any given NPC is referred to by a name, as in "Bob" rather than just "the waiter", then that NPC is at least important enough to give priority (but not necessarily absolute) control to whoever introduced that NPC, or the GM in charge of the RP, whichever is best for the situation. Conversely, if somebody introduces an NPC without giving them a name, then that NPC is probably unimportant enough that everyone involved in the RP can dictate their actions and reactions moderately freely.

Like BW said, I haven't gone with the idea that a name would distinguish if the NPC could be used by roleplayers or not. I do give limited control of NPCs on a varying degrees based on importance though on a case by case situation. Implementing something more clearer like this might be something I will have to look into.

As for NPCs versus secondary characters , I have been guilty of being between the lines of the two and the lines can be challenging to distinguish at times even harder so when a group of NPCs were the main characters of a previous story and now that I turned that story into a roleplay set years later it has been hard to shove them into a box labeled NPC when there is a lot of history about them.
No big deal

Go ahead and remake this thread in the other section and you'll be fine.
Psst, you might want to put this in the Off-Topic section. You might get more relevant posts there since this section is for roleplay specific things.

Rules:


Love them, hate 'em or sometimes assigned to assassinate them, NPCs are something you are faced with while roleplaying. Throughout my time GMing and roleplaying I've seen them being used both as a GM inclusive device while other times they've been free to use by anyone. Sometimes it is even a mixture between these two extremes with roleplayers having a limited use of an NPC or it being a case by case situation. I've seen important NPCs that would have so much details and even an inner monologue written in a post that they almost seem like a character instead of an NPC while other times I've seen an NPC with equal importance that go without the inner thoughts and such with far less background information. Although not as controversial or seen in a variety of ways compared to others things concerning roleplaying, it will be a great starting place for us.

As a launching point for discussion here are a few questions to get things rolling:
What is your take on an NPC? How much of an importance should be put on them? How should an NPC be dealt with in the IC and who should be able to control them? GM/roleplayers, what has been your experience with NPCs and what has worked best for you in the roleplays you've been in? How is a good NPC played?
Alright I'm home guys and back in business. How was everyone's holiday (or week for those that are not in the U.S.)? Kimono, how is your history section going?
No worries Viktor. Things like that should always take first priority. Hoping for the best for you and your family.

To answer your question PoS, he's covering the Charlie's tracks but not exactly deleting their digital life. He's doing things a bit differently but it will be revealed all in due time and yes BW, it's exactly what you are thinking.
I've added a little snippet at the end of my last post about what Cameron is doing right now for a little teaser on what is to come. It probably be mentioned a little bit in the next chapter but the Charlie's focus won't be on it until a little more further down the road.
Ah alright. It's no rush or anything so just tell me once it's up and running.

Oh and as a heads up for thanksgiving next week I'll be out of town Wednesday through Saturday. I'll be off and on every once in awhile with my phone but don't expect me to be around much.
Jester! It's nice to see you again! How's life been treating you?

Haha you'll get used to it Platanus.
© 2007-2026
BBCode Cheatsheet