Avatar of Sodium
  • Last Seen: 3 mos ago
  • Joined: 11 yrs ago
  • Posts: 264 (0.06 / day)
  • VMs: 1
  • Username history
    1. Sodium 11 yrs ago

Status

Recent Statuses

10 yrs ago
I never realized my profile was so popular.

Bio

User has no bio, yet

Most Recent Posts

Since most everyone here seems incapable of processing full paragraphs (See: Zero Hex discussion), I'll format this in a way it'll be understood.

I'm done.

I thought I could handle the lack of reading comprehension skills displayed by those in this game, but my patience has run out.

Who the hell takes nigh on two weeks to approve a character? It should take about ten minutes to read and thirty to write up a response.

Perhaps worse than any of this is the refusal to consider a differing opinion, whether by intention or ignorance.

I see no reason for me to waste my time and effort with a trainwreck like this any longer. Once more, I'm done.

Enjoy your trainwreck. Knowing the GMs, it'll be in slow motion.
[redacted]
So we got 1 for Hueco Mundo mission and 2 for Soul Society mission. Any more volunteers before I start a draft?=D

If Captain @Hantu Kongkek orders it, Joan's up for going on either mission.
Removed to prevent Skype spam.
[redacted]
A thought just struck me. Since a zanpakuto is influenced by the shinigami's soul, would it be possible for the appearance to change over time as the shinigami changes?
@Celaira
That does not make it a personal attack. It merely provides a personal reason for the extra scrutiny. In fact, Zobozun is describing a personal attack that Yoshua performed against him.
@Ganryu @Celaira
I don't see a personal attack here. What I see is a serious discussion, and a group of unrelated people blowing it out of proportion in order to save their silly conversation space. I could just as easily ask the silly one-line-that-doesn't-really-contribute-anything-to-the-discussion posters to keep those to PMs and have just as much, if not more, grounds for the request.

@Axel
An intellectual discussion of characters can serve to improve both those involved and those who witness it. This site seems to always expect the worst outcome from a discussion where two parties disagree. I have one question:

Why?

Nothing good can come from shying away from chances for growth. Discussion and the exchange of ideas is the easiest way to grow intellectually. If discourse is discouraged, the only outcome is stagnation. I've seen faaaaaaaaaar too many games die out simply because nobody could bear to say something that another disagreed with, which led to everyone internalizing their disagreements and eventually just leaving because the joy of the game was gone.

Telling people to carry out discussions privately essentially tells them their discussion isn't wanted. It does more damage than you'd expect, as there's an implied "your discussion isn't important enough to hold where everyone can see it" message, and even if those involved don't realize it, the message gets across. In this case it's especially bad, as now a co-GM is telling players that a discussion that SHOULD be important to the GMs should not be handled in a place visible to the GMs.

Anyway, I have my character finished. I'll post it when I decide whether I'm joining or not.
Guys take it to Pms please if you have a dispute.


What point is there in having a roleplay OOC if every time serious discussion of characters comes up it's considered a "dispute" and someone requests it be moved into private? Especially since the other 19 pages are so filled with roleplay-centric discussion (is my sarcasm thick enough?).
@Hantu Kongkek
I rather like that idea. You can count me in, too. Foreign exchange shinigami are a cool concept.
© 2007-2026
BBCode Cheatsheet