The Nexerus

World in Revolution: 1861

Pasta Sentient said
Love the attempts at the refusal. I stated all this in the IC so if you disagree place it there. But if anyone needs proof I do have it.

Really? Okay, great. PM it to me then, since you don't want an argument in the OOC.

@"That it wouldn't have a verifiable signature is a good and fair point, but disregarding it IC because the spelling isn't perfect (or the numerals)?"

I never said to disregard it IC. I was merely making the point that OOC, is it abundantly clear that it was not written by myself.

World in Revolution: 1861

So Boerd said
Correct IV, 8th coalition, "members" as opposed to "members'". Awful forgery and it wouldn't have authentic signatures.

'Members' is correct in that context, though?

World in Revolution: 1861

AegonVI said
UR trying to draft the help of the UK.

It's funny how 'UK' has become such a common moniker for Great Britain, and in the RP it's no longer applicable.

World in Revolution: 1861

Pasta, I wrote the Treaty of Amsterdam. You should've written your Article IV to look more like something I'd write. Using the correct Roman numeral for 'four' would've been a good start.

World in Revolution: 1861

I believe you have to roll poorly enough for the plot to be uncovered and traced back to you in order to lose prestige. Simply not succeeding doesn't cut it.

@Narco: Only ever RPed on one site other than RPG, and it wasn't that one.

World in Revolution: 1861

Finally, a real snip.

World in Revolution: 1861

Speaking of which, how does prestige work? Obviously you lose it by breaking treaties and attempting assassinations and so on, but how do you gain it?

World in Revolution: 1861

Pepperm1nts said
I'm going to agree on this being super silly. It's painfully obvious sometimes, with some of you. Like, I've noticed some people trying to deny certain things in OOC, and getting really defensive about like they've convinced themselves they're not full of shit. It's silly and unnecessary. There is no need to lie in OOC. It's especially silly when you get into an argument because you're trying to lie so hard about something.

I haven't lied about anything have to do with the Wartime Reciprocity Treaty. All of the allegations that I coerced France into the deal in any which way are completely and utterly false, and tantamount to OOC insults.

World in Revolution: 1861

I feel like joining in to this "make a post then edit it clean" craze, so...

SNIP

World in Revolution: 1861

AegonVI said
Insert my posts about Prussia at one point not having Alsace Lorraine or that formerly-a-part-of-Denmark land.The argument can very easily be made (as I wanted it to be in the former case), but are you going to act on it and throw France back into the war against you?

Alsace-Lorraine is guaranteed to Prussia by the treaties that ended the war with Austria and with France.