The Nexerus

World in Revolution: 1861

^ I imagine that'll be awhile.

Ampharos said
Pepperm1nts, I've been wondering. How do you do that thing with your signature changing with each refresh?

He uses this site.

World in Revolution: 1861

Is that 1900 WiR happening, Stein?

World in Revolution: 1861

It makes a measure of IC sense, but it also sets a precedent.

When Sex Ed Is Stupid

Shoopthewoop said
Back in my day (7 years ago) in Israel we had sex head for 2 months.

In Israel, children are given two months worth of education in giving head.

I went to a Catholic High School, so on top of everything else (which was pretty comprehensive), we were given a course in support of abstinence every year.

World in Revolution: 1861

Pasta Sentient said
*Sigh* Alright, I'll come clean and apologize. Mine was edited. It was not supposed to blow up like this. Merely used as documents to assist in the game. I won't justify it, but the shit I have consistently received from Nexerus, So Boerd and such OOCly has simply made me extremely competitive to that point. I don't appreciate their constant badgering or attempts to put me down. So yes... there is that OOC grudge there and I apologize for it.If Outcast wishes for me to leave the game I shall, but I do apologize for the actions to everyone who thought otherwise. It was wrong and I should not have crossed that line. I hope this does not effect the game ICly.

I don't want you to leave the game, I just want all of this petty bullshit to stop OOC.

World in Revolution: 1861

solamelike said Also Nexerus's font is different than actual font on the website, but this could simply be his screen or my screen displaying the font slightly differently (Size of screen and what not)

I just zoomed out with Ctrl - so that I could take a screenshot with context. If you want something with standard font size, I can take more screenshots without zooming out. They take all of a second.

I don't really think it's necessary at this point, though.

World in Revolution: 1861

Ampharos said
Are we really doing this whole lying in the OOC thing again? Like, this is beyond lame.

I agree. It's even worse considering that the offending party isn't in the roleplay at all.

World in Revolution: 1861

An open letter from King William III of the Netherlands to the British Parliament,

Of late, I have found myself overcome with various curiosities concerning the Republic of Great Britain, and in particular her government's continued attempts at inflaming the gradually dissolving war on the European continent. Of special note in my plethora of concerns is the strong conflict between the two primary British interests on the mainland of Europe: the revival of the long dead Kingdom of Belgium, and the continued maintenance of the alliance between Paris and London. It was to protect those two interests that the United Republic entered into the war in the first place—by Albert Edward's words, not mine. Edward saw the Eighth Coalition as a 'Coalition of Tyranny', due to it having formed as a group of nations siding with the Kingdom of the Netherlands in favour of Dutch reunification. London saw the annexation of Flanders as tyrannical, of course. It is from that stance that my question arises.

The topical conflict occurs as a result of the Empire of France's stance on the legality of the current borders of the territory formerly called Belgium. As of the Treaty of Brussels, signed by Emperor Napoleon III, the Belgian state ceased to exist in any form, de jure or de facto. Its two constituent territories, Wallonia and Flanders, were transferred to the French Empire and the Kingdom of the Netherlands, respectively. I will reiterate that last point, so as to make it abundantly clear to The Honourable Albert Edward; Wallonia, a territory which the United Republic considers to be part of the Kingdom of Belgium, is currently recognized by France as one of its own constituent territories. That situation, a disagreement of sovereignty, seems to be precisely the same as the affair for which the British declared war on the Netherlands. The Netherlands recognizes Flanders as its own territory, Britain disagrees, Britain declares war. The Empire of France recognizes Wallonia as its own territory, Britain disagrees, Britain... does nothing?

The King of Rhetoric himself, Albert Edward, has not a single word to utter regarding the Wallonian situation. For Flanders to be part of the Kingdom of the Netherlands is absolutely tyrannical, says The Honourable Prime Minister, and for Wallonia to be part of the French Empire is not something worth discussing. Besides displaying a horrific level of double standard, the British governor's continued denial of Dutch unity and acceptance of French ownership of Wallonia displays most importantly of all the true motives of his actions. Britain does not act in favour of law, or of treaties, or providence and virtue. This situation would dictate, instead, that Britain acts in favour of its own selfish designs. It does not fight for any reason other than to display dominance, as if rather than a collection of civilized nation-states, the countries of Europe were instead raging barbarians. However, I will give Albert Edward an opportunity to clarify his stance, so as to preserve his considerable and surely duly earned prestige.

What is London's position on Wallonia, Honourable Prime Minister Albert Edward?

World in Revolution: 1861

I can post the rest of the conversation in context in more screenshots, if necessary. Kho is a liar, and it is incredibly silly for him to even be in this thread at all, let alone be trying to affect the roleplay.

World in Revolution: 1861

Kho, that's photoshopped. It's silly that you created it and that you're continuing to involve yourself in this RP behind the scenes, and it also shows everyone that you are incapable of letting bygones be bygones, and continue grudges from one roleplay to the next. You are exceptionally immature.