Alright, I want to have the "Neutral Party" trait.
Call my nation The United Kingdoms of Athos and Stules, please.
You pick your trait once it's your turn.
The Nexerus
Member
Sui generis
- Last Seen: 4 yrs ago
- Joined: 12 yrs ago
- Posts: 4060 (0.89 / day)
- VMs: 5
-
Username history
- The Nexerus 12 yrs ago
Status
User has no status, yet
Bio
User has no bio, yet
Most Recent Posts
You pick your trait once it's your turn.
I always approach fantasy names etymologically. Random name generators tend to generate incredibly generic sounding names. If you use a real language, but one most people aren't familiar with, it seems realistic without being obviously taken from a real vocabulary (and thereby destroying immersion).
As an example: my nation's name in the previous AoI was 'Aontas', which is just the Irish word for 'union'. Chose it because Aontas the nation was created as a union of two different kingdoms.
As an example: my nation's name in the previous AoI was 'Aontas', which is just the Irish word for 'union'. Chose it because Aontas the nation was created as a union of two different kingdoms.
Have you ever tried walking/running as fast as a train for two hours?
Yes. It was easy. Clearly the problem here is that Halo needs to work out more.
I don't have a problem with sarcasm. But after I showed you that others think you are a disruptive character and that I proved your accusations wrong, a tad if humility would be nice to see.
I made this clear just before you decided to leave. If you're tired of me disrupting things with all of my nasty participation, I won't help you any more. You can write the OP and find and calculate statistics yourself.
If you're going to get me to do things to help with the roleplay, you're gonna need to be able to tolerate my presence.
This is exactly what I am fucking talking about.
None of the rules include the phrase "no sarcasm". I wrote most of the OP so I think I'd know.
Like I said, I can try to be less harsh, but if the problem you have with me is foundational to my personality, or related to my attempts to improve things, there's nothing I could possibly do to address that.
Much better without accusations. If you have any specific pragmatic plan gif how to proceed, please present it.
Why does my specific pragmatic plan for how to proceed need to be presented in .gif format?
Since the meat of my comment was ignored I'll post it again.
Maybe I could be less vitriolic when I bring things up, but I'm not going to stop trying to improve things just to avoid hurting feelings.
No, I don't think you need to leave. Yes, I'd rather the game keep running.
Maybe I could be less vitriolic when I bring things up, but I'm not going to stop trying to improve things just to avoid hurting feelings.
No, I don't think you need to leave. Yes, I'd rather the game keep running.
@Gaebrael Was the "trusted individual" you received approval from for the OP yourself, under a different name?
Edition #2
I'd be cool with playing WiR still, but not with armies that can only be divided down into three portions, and especially not when those armies 'respawn' when defeated. Maybe I could be less vitriolic when I bring things up, but I'm not going to stop trying to improve things just to avoid hurting feelings.
And no, I don't think you need to leave.
tl;dr GM may or may not have quit
Edition #2
I'd be cool with playing WiR still, but not with armies that can only be divided down into three portions, and especially not when those armies 'respawn' when defeated. Maybe I could be less vitriolic when I bring things up, but I'm not going to stop trying to improve things just to avoid hurting feelings.
And no, I don't think you need to leave.
tl;dr GM may or may not have quit
© 2007-2026