The Red Seelie Member
Eliminate the Impossible
What remains is Truth
- Last Seen: 2 yrs ago
- Joined: 12 yrs ago
- Posts: 6463 (1.45 / day)
- VMs: 3
-
Username history
- The Red Seelie 2 yrs ago
- ████████ 12 yrs ago
-
Latest 10 profile visitors:
-
Most recent →
Ammokkx,
Shiny Keldeo,
Temporary
Status
Recent Statuses
7 yrs ago
Y'know with all the new Isekai concepts coming out, I wonder if there is an isekai concept for "Reincarnated as a Truck that sends people to other worlds"
3
likes
7 yrs ago
Draw 2 Cards
1
like
10 yrs ago
When your bored but don't really know why.
2
likes
11 yrs ago
That moment when you have a billion ideas and can't write them all down
1
like
11 yrs ago
I always win the coin flip... always...
4
likes
Bio
hi
Most Recent Posts
can someone check my first characters deck aka ME i think theirs some spelling errors in it but other wise i can't see anything wrong
Rethel34 said
フォング - The "Fang" part of "Silver Fang"ファング - The "fang" part of "Naturia Spiderfang" and "Flyfang"Japanese is different and capitalization is different. I don't think they're the same archetype. However, "Silver Fang" can be involved with the rest of the "Fang" monsters.
HELL YEA! XD
my favorite normal monster XD
rethal can u check Charaks deck to see if anything needs changing
Scarifar said
Still needs "Beast-type" instead of "beast" in that Xyz requirement. Also, is that a period instead of a comma in the name?
yes it was i didn't notcied that (fixed)
also I used beast as a placeholder XD here we go
Rethel34 said
Would Flyfang technically be considered part of the archetype? I know capitalization typically matters.Hmm . . . let me look into thisEDIT: Honestly, they look good to me, Scar. If Empire agrees I'll add them to the first post
probably not but empire pointed it out so i was just going with it
Fixed
UnendingEmpire said
No problem :)As for Black Shark, I wasn't really even aware it existed at all, and just sort of assumed it was another old-timey Normal Monster I'd never seen before. Though if that's the case, you should also add his name to Man-Eating Licorice's effect, since it affects "Man-Eating" monsters on the field.EDIT: @Charak: ...Silver Fang a "Fang" monster :| so are Flyfang and Naturia Spiderfang
yep yep and i knew that
XD because i wanted to create a natruia + this thing
and i like flyfang
XD i literally did that on purpose
_____________________________________
and Rethel im fixing it.
Firstly I wanted to include the card Silver Fang into this archetype.
but alas I will make editations to the card.
but alas I will make editations to the card.
UnendingEmpire said
Effect-wise, nothing really. It's just your OGG (Official Game Grammar) needing correction is all. (Yes, I'm nitpicking. It's not even noon here and I haven't had breakfast yet, so just bear with me here.)That aside...@Rethel:
k if i get it right its the wording So what should it be?
(also i finished charak's deck so can u check that for me)
OGG Correction said
5 Level 3 Beast-Type monsters
As long as this card has an Xyz Material, it gains 200 ATK for each face-up "Fang" monster on the field. Once per turn, you can detach one Xyz Material from this card "to" Special Summon 1 "Fang" monster from your Graveyard.
Please Charak, OGG isn't that hard to learn or adhere to.
explain this slowly what i did wrong with this card
5 Level 3 Beast-Type monsters
As long as this card has an Xyz Material, it gains 200 ATK for each face-up "Fang" monster on the field. Once per turn, you can detach one Xyz Material from this card "to" Special Summon 1 "Fang" monster from your Graveyard.
Please Charak, OGG isn't that hard to learn or adhere to.
explain this slowly what i did wrong with this card
Deck posted XD
© 2007-2026