Avatar of Vilageidiotx
  • Last Seen: 3 yrs ago
  • Joined: 12 yrs ago
  • Posts: 4839 (1.08 / day)
  • VMs: 2
  • Username history
    1. Vilageidiotx 12 yrs ago
  • Latest 10 profile visitors:

Status

Recent Statuses

8 yrs ago
Current I RP for the ladies
4 likes
8 yrs ago
#Diapergate #Hugs2018
2 likes
9 yrs ago
I fucking love catfishing
2 likes
9 yrs ago
Every time I insult a certain coworker, i'll take money from their jar. Saving for beer would never be easier!
4 likes
9 yrs ago
The Jungle Book is good.
3 likes

Bio







Most Recent Posts

i will join so it looks like i have friends
But then I figured it out! The solution to greed and manipulation is happiness. If everyone is happy and satisfied, then there's no reason for anyone to hurt anyone else.

We need to solve drugs and the human body.


Don't tell Aldous Huxley.
There are plenty of questions with only one definite answer. And yeah, the logistics wouldn't work now, but they could sometime in the future.


Well, it's like Jesus said, Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? Who is watching the watchmen... or test-givers. If you create a system where this test-giving is always in the right hands, you've found a system that makes democracy unnecessary in the first place.
jesus, they have a hard time counting normal votes. how the fuck they gonna pull off that slight an adjustment?

But really, the problem with intelligence testing isn't that the factoring of intelligence is itself inherently evil, it's that intelligence is pretty hard to quantify and you couldn't trust the people who make the tests, so it would be to easy to politicize. Here in the states, incoming administration could so something like add the question "Global warming is a hoax y/n" with a "No" answer shooting down your score. Then bam, it becomes a test of political purity and we get into some weird territory.

A good example of how this has worked in real life comes from the South, where the literacy tests for voting used back in the Jim Crow days would involve asking the testee a vague question, with the answer's rightness or wrongness being determined by the tester. Made it easy as shit for the tester to make personally biased decisions on who can and cannot vote, which they used to turn away black voters.
Here we see an ASCII representation of the state of @Dinh AaronMk's wallpaper.
Did sumon say mems?



last time i tried for a prussia game, i annexed hamburg and basically everyone declared war on me. i got fuckin' hitlered.
<Snipped quote by Lucian>

You dont count.


ah, we've all been through that. things will get easier as you get older.
woo! a post!
<Snipped quote by Byrd Man>

So far in the story it's coming to the end of the 2004 campaign and John Kerry's misuse of him as a VP during the time.

But based on Andrew Young's POV for the story, Edwards sounded a lot like a Clinton than he did a Sanders, just younger, a dude, and with a young almost 1960's Kennedy family.


Has there even really been a Sanders equivalent after McGovern? I mean, one that was making real numbers, not Kucinich or anybody like that in the little leagues. It seems like milquetoast liberal has been the norm for the Democrats for a generation or two.
© 2007-2026
BBCode Cheatsheet