Host said
Who has a square smile?
It looks more grateful than :)
whizzball1 Member
Spirit
- Last Seen: 5 yrs ago
- Old Guild Username: whizzball1
- Joined: 13 yrs ago
- Posts: 15387 (3.36 / day)
- VMs: 0
-
Username history
- whizzball1 13 yrs ago
-
Latest 10 profile visitors:
-
Most recent →
Audacious
Status
User has no status, yet
Bio
User has no bio, yet
Most Recent Posts
It looks more grateful than :)
Host said
Okah, I didn't want to use it. That's your thing.
:]
Host said
So can I just do that?
-Svár- Not at first. You'll have to really understand the patters to know how to get the chaos out of them. Over time you develop an intuition of understanding, and any new patterns are easy to use. Also, you have to have the innate ability to use it. If you don't have that, then you unfortunately won't be able to use it. Unless you found some kind of workaround, which in this immense multiverse isn't too far-fetched.
Host said
The less orthodox the better!
-Svár- Of course.
Also, I'd like, if it's possible, for Kelly not to be able to use the harmonised chaos.
souleaterfan320 said
*harlock wonders around the same area as svar and kelly*stupid blue haired girl, doesnt understand anything, she doesnt know what ive been through...*kicks a can*
There's an extremely small possibility that Harlock would possibly be in the same spot in the same universe that Svár and Kelly are in.
Host said
Go ahead.Oh, should I upload Prism Vs. Unity somewhere?
Sure.
souleaterfan320 said
you sure?
Do it at the base. Svár and Kelly are somewhere else. Ruby and Techi are in the base.
Host said
So if I have a clock that works fine, take another clock that works fine, shove them together with chaos magic, the two orders will cause chaos?
-Svár- Really unorthodox, but I suppose. Wow, never thought I would say Unorthodox.
Host said
Okay, good. I'll write up Isis in a bit.
Great.
Host said
If people bother to read it. Oh, and this is probably a bad time to mention it, but I wrote a description of our RP on an interest thread a while ago. Not as in depth, but we could have used it. Sorry.
Oh, I knew about it. But it wasn't as in depth and I wanted the description to be more in depth so I didn't mention it. :P
© 2007-2026