Avatar of MoiraEl
  • Last Seen: 8 yrs ago
  • Joined: 8 yrs ago
  • Posts: 126 (0.04 / day)
  • VMs: 0
  • Username history
    1. MoiraEl 8 yrs ago

Status

User has no status, yet

Bio

User has no bio, yet

Most Recent Posts

MEADE
Ackles is a Person's name and oddly it's apparently really difficult to change so we'll go with a new word now.

Part
you could have done ankles, but...

Pear!
Pearl
Regina popped her knuckles as her large, foxy face rounded the corner, "Yeah, Charles, you sure done it this time."

She'd noticed him earlier and stuck back to tail him through the alleyways; he's no real threat, the Bombers kill the Razors and get'em off the streets. But, who knows? Better safe than sorry. She paced her way down the alleyway, methodically. Like a movie-style villain.

"Where're you off to, Charlie? Huh?"

She reached into her back pocket and pulled out a pair of bright, neon-blue knuckledusters, sliding them onto her hands.

"Wherever it is, you better run."

With that, she breaks off in a sprint down the alleyway, trying to close the gap on Charlie.
In Ѧasks 8 yrs ago Forum: Advanced Roleplay
skav is free for a race if anyone is in need of interaction ;D


Still up for a race? We're in different gangs, but.
In CLOSED. 8 yrs ago Forum: Casual Roleplay
@HushedWhispers Here's a second character for you, now that the boys are the majority.

In THIS OR THAT 8 yrs ago Forum: Spam Forum
Puppy

Drama or comedy?
Picker
<Snipped quote by MoiraEl>

Anyways, right-libertarianism is a sham. <- Meant this.



Saying that disagrees with this...-.-

And frankly, most people understand exactly what it means...It actually has a pretty on point definition on what they usually stand for. What else would you prefer it being called?


1) that chart means nothing
2) I never said that we shouldn't call it right-libertarianism.
3) I was arguing that right-libertarianism defeats it's own purposes of economic freedom and personal autonomy.
@MoiraEl I won't get into debating this...because I'm done enough already...So, I agree to disagree with that general statement.

But I will point out, most people that fall under this category believe this statement is a positive one. I mean I don't really like people using it like the new opposition to "you must be a republican" like an insult equal to calling someone a Nazi...But it's the internet...and both sides use the term. Whether negative or positive. :/


I mean, its not a general statement. I said to specify what groups you're attacking specifically instead of hiding behind a vague term like SJW, which may encompass many conflicting theories and doesn't have.

And ultimately whether people use it positively or negatively has no bearing on the fact that it is an overly vague term with no real value.
© 2007-2024
BBCode Cheatsheet