• Last Seen: 3 yrs ago
  • Joined: 9 yrs ago
  • Posts: 920 (0.27 / day)
  • VMs: 2
  • Username history
    1. DELETED32084 3 yrs ago
    2. ██████████ 5 yrs ago
    3. ██████████████ 5 yrs ago
    4. ████████ 9 yrs ago

Status

User has no status, yet

Bio

User has no bio, yet

Most Recent Posts

@ClocktowerEchos, sure, why not.
@Letter Beeokie dokie.
@Letter Bee, I honestly think a Japanese female peasant is more realistic than Britain just going “Sure Egypt, you can have this insanely vital trade route, go crazy! No way this could possibly go wrong!”

Also, Egypt with ships of the line? Please. That’s like giving Brasil battleships in Second World War.

Nothing against Egypt being a thing, but it wouldn’t be a decent power, barely even a regional one.
@Lady Lasciviousagreed, a desire to make Egypt powerful. Perhaps if there is some rework allowed, it would be good. I’m willing to play 1840’s Britain, but she’s going to be far more powerful than historical Britain since the British theory was they would always be more powerful than the next two navies combined.
Yes, my alt is certainly unlikely. But more unlikely than the British voluntarily handing over all of that to Egypt, and Egypt not suffering massive internal strife as a result of Ali's concessions? I somewhat doubt it. Yeah, it's unlikely - but honestly, to me, it seemed perfectly reasonable by the standards of the central premise put forth.


Also saw this bit, and yea, would never happen. Worth to much money.

Do my eyes deceive me, or does this roleplay require an active British player?

Disregard, I see Egypt somehow got a powerful fleet and thinks its a world power. I'm out.





@ClocktowerEchos, Those are all very good questions I will attempt to sort out this evening.





© 2007-2026
BBCode Cheatsheet