Tamberlaine and evil David are a team for the ages.
"Tamberlaine"
Sorry, had to clean. Back permanently.
<Snipped quote by souleaterfan320>
They're pretty good at what they do, especially since neither is backstabbing.
Mmmmmhmm. No need to.
Efficacy Member
Bryson
STATUS: So what if I used Diego Hargreeves for a face claim? Couldn't resist. 6 yrs ago
- Last Seen: 5 yrs ago
- Joined: 10 yrs ago
- Posts: 1573 (0.42 / day)
- VMs: 0
-
Username history
- Efficacy 10 yrs ago
Status
Recent Statuses
6 yrs ago
Current
So what if I used Diego Hargreeves for a face claim? Couldn't resist.
1
like
Bio
User has no bio, yet
Most Recent Posts
"Tamberlaine"
Mmmmmhmm. No need to.
<Snipped quote by Efficacy>
I plan to reconfigure, not necessarily compress. Regardless, I may give the sword to one of you, especially if Part B pans out. Either way, the most difficult part will be to get him in one location.
Isolating people from teleportation is tough. One of whom?
<Snipped quote by Efficacy>
Mhm. Each nanobot receives instructions remotely, for some reason. I doubt the source is well protected, and even if it is, there's an easy way to overcome the remote instructions. I could be entirely black-boxed and still break it.
That's that, then. So, once you've made the Holy Sword into an actually working Holy Sword, you plan to reconstruct it, compressing all the matter, making it usable. Having done that, do you have any plans for getting to Unity with it? He's a formidable opponent.
<Snipped quote by Efficacy>
He's more of a robot than a program.
And you doubt he can defend himself well from cyber attacks.
<Snipped quote by Efficacy>
Because I'm not impressed with his sense of security.
Computer security? I remember that he's a program.
<Snipped quote by Efficacy>
It won't.
Why don't you think so?
<Snipped quote by Efficacy>
I'm not sure. It may be to eventually destroy it.
Hmm. We may have to deal with that if it ever becomes a threat.
<Snipped quote by Efficacy>
Significanty. They could eat anything made of matter.
What are his intentions? I'd rather not have Existence filled with nanobots. It wouldn't be fun anymore.
<Snipped quote by Efficacy>
I believe his operate atomically rather than being carbon-consuming.
Which would make it easier for them to spread, I assume.
<Snipped quote by Efficacy>
Self-replicating nanobots consuming everything.
Ah, yes. That would be rather unfortunate.
© 2007-2026