Avatar of Gwazi Magnum
  • Last Seen: 8 yrs ago
  • Old Guild Username: Gwazi Magnum
  • Joined: 12 yrs ago
  • Posts: 32489 (7.15 / day)
  • VMs: 0
  • Username history
    1. Gwazi Magnum 12 yrs ago
  • Latest 10 profile visitors:

Status

Recent Statuses

9 yrs ago
Current :magnum:
1 like
11 yrs ago
PRAISE THE SUN!!!
11 yrs ago
Note to self, enter = post.
11 yrs ago
Apparently these are a thing.

Bio

You followed me all the way to my Bio? Well... Now we must drop it.

Most Recent Posts

natsumehack said
Took you long enough.


To be fair, up to that point everything you said seemed like typical responses you'd have towards me. :P
LoneSilverWolf said
BUT, it has worked before, magnum. They have used it on OTHER people in the past, who are in a similar situation as he was. They stand to gain another success story if it works, and judging by the prior evidence, it will. We're not talking about something that's never been used, or that has been shown to kill half the people it's given too. So I'd say there's a lot more to be gained then lost here.


It issue is it's not confirmed to be safe enough yet though to be given out to the public like that.
That's why it's still under testing, the risk is still there.

Now note, I understand the concept of going with something not fully in yet and rolling the dice.
My Mom did the same with ABA Therapy when I was diagnosed with Autism (It was simply a small University study atm) and it worked.
I know this kind of stuff can work.

The issue is this one plays with people's lives, in the sense that people could live or die depending on the actions taken.
You're right that in this case (at least from the info we have) odds are in favor of it working.

But if it doesn't, the results could be terrible.

Personally, assuming there aren't any other medical concerns the company has that the media isn't shedding light on I would support getting the child the medication, and if it does go bad take note of it and use it to help improve the product before others take it. But I understand the legal concerns, where they may not even have the chance to give said medication to others if giving it to the child does in fact turn out bad or simply fails to help him.
Ainmire said
He's just pasting quotes from this song.


I noticed after that third one which seemed off :P
natsumehack said
Dancing jigs, until I'm crippled, down 10 drinks i'm still not pickled.


I've got to hand it to you
You've played by all the same rules
natsumehack said
Pleasing everyone isn't like you.


The world would be boring if everyone just agreed with me. :P

I mean just imagine being Mario, walking up to Bowser and going "Yo Bowser! I want peach back!" and him going "Yea I agree, I like you Mario. Have her back".
That's be such a dull game don't you think?
LoneSilverWolf said
He's right, you know :P


:3 Morgan Freeman quotes make me happy...
LoneSilverWolf said
So if it was your child, and the drug was his ONLY chance to live, and it has successfully treated those in his exact situation, you'd let him die just because it hasn't *yet* been approved by the FDA?


They can correct me if my impression is wrong.
But I don't think they're saying that the child should die cause the drug isn't approved.

Just that doing so opens many risks of not only hurting the child but causing the company to suffer.
And by extension many others who may of otherwise benefited from their drug.
8/10

Humourous pic, and the words underneath both terribly and amazingly fit with the picture at the same time.
See! You're learning! :)
"You have enemies? Good. That means you’ve stood up for something, sometime in your life" - Winston Churchill

Not to say you should be trying to make enemies.
But don't get worried over if people like you or not either.
© 2007-2026
BBCode Cheatsheet