Avatar of Gwazi Magnum
  • Last Seen: 8 yrs ago
  • Old Guild Username: Gwazi Magnum
  • Joined: 12 yrs ago
  • Posts: 32489 (7.15 / day)
  • VMs: 0
  • Username history
    1. Gwazi Magnum 12 yrs ago
  • Latest 10 profile visitors:

Status

Recent Statuses

9 yrs ago
Current :magnum:
1 like
11 yrs ago
PRAISE THE SUN!!!
11 yrs ago
Note to self, enter = post.
11 yrs ago
Apparently these are a thing.

Bio

You followed me all the way to my Bio? Well... Now we must drop it.

Most Recent Posts

Ok, so I'm part of an atheist community and just went ahead and asked them what's the difference between normal atheism and new atheism.

In the meantime though, from the info I gathered (from here and a simple google search) is accurate, it seems to mean mostly agreeing with stuff Christopher Hitchens and Richard Dawkins say. Stuff like you don't need religion to be moral, not using religion as an influence in decision making etc.

And with that info, I would call myself a new Atheist.
And I don't see what's to dislike (outside of religious reasons) for an atheist saying that they can be moral without a religion.
So I'm assuming there's more to the term of New Atheism than has been revealed to my searches on it so far.

Brovo said
Hmm...


natsumehack said
Well I am not a band nor a artist,nor do I take drugs. .


It worked for the girl who slept with multiple boys and showed her boobs online.

But then not for all the children who were simply bullied too much... -.-
Turtlicious said
I'd rather say too much, I just feel a lot better then I have in a while.


I assume you mean "I'd rather not say too much"? :P
If you mean Atheism+ I agree with you 100%.
LoneSilverWolf said
What's bothering me? A LOT of personal fucking shit right now. You know, everything just seems to crash down all at once, and just....I'm getting sick of this. I really am; from my personal life with someone I REALLY freaking cared about and lost, to this shit with our home, and now some personal things going on with my family....it's getting to be sooooooooo freaking much. Seriously, doesn't the freaking storms ever let tf up??!!`end rant`


Life can be a rough ride like that at times.:/

If you feel the need to rant more on that to let it out of your system feel free too.
We're all here for you in you need it.
Dark Wind said If we are talking certain things, not so much might be correct. However, there are still things there. For example, when it comes to the discussion of maternity leave, the stats are pretty skewed. Very few men leave their jobs for this, while a much higher percentage of women do. Something worth looking into.

And as I've said before, a big thing feminism today is fighting for is not for female domination, but for equality on a social level.


I realize there are still issues for women here like maternity leave.
I wasn't trying to say there wasn't, but those things have been listed and argued for millions of times now.
But the issues facing men are largely ignored or brushed off, so I felt specific need to bring those up when the topic was about if we're feminist or not and why.

As for feminism = Gender equality.

This leads me to one big question right off the bat. If this is true why is it called feminism?

Other than that, I'd argue simply looking at feminist today that seems to be pretty split down the middle.
You've got plenty of those who do want gender equality, and plenty who don't.
Hell I've been called "The reason feminism still needs to exist" simply for saying that I was a humanist.

Dark Wind said Women are still the lesser gender in terms of rights globally. But, we are primarily focusing on 1st world countries. I definitely don't believe it as an issue that plagues men and women equally. Socially, women face more systemic oppression than men. I do agree that men face prejudices, but it's not quite the scale that women face. Especially if we talk about sexual intercourse and the stigmas a very sexually active woman faces from men AND women alike. Or that a lot of insults that we use in the english language are associated with… women.

Gender inequality, women have the short end of the stick. Don't misunderstand me. Gender roles harms both men and women, however the roles of men are favorable in comparison. Fighting against the gender roles of women would successfully free men from their roles as well, no?


Globally yes, but individually you've got the 3rd world countries where it's still a big issue. Then 1st world countries where for many of them it's not an issue.
You can't just say "Globally women are treated like less" and then address every country like that's an issue.

That's like saying "Globally people are starving" and then solving that by starting food drives and charities for Americans.
You need to look at area's in a case by case basis.

Also like I said above, I agree there are issues women still face. I never argued this, but there are also male issues.
And at least with women issues the majority of people are agreeing they're treated unfairly and working to fix it.
Men and their issues? Not so much... Many people just think of it as silly, or that somehow fighting for men's rights is sexist against women.

You're half-right in saying fighting against women gender roles will help men. It would help by extension some men issues.
But Ultimately all it does is make women accepted into everything, and men simply more commonly filling in the blank.
Rather than say both men and women being accepted into everything.

Dark Wind said This would be a good thing. Representation of women in the media is awful because it also hurts men.


Yes, this would be a good thing.
I was trying to say "Yes, women would be helped. This is good. But let's not get so caught up in it that we forget all about the men".

Dark Wind said And feminism, I mean actual feminism, agrees that these things should be fought against. A man is laughed at for reporting rape… Why do you think that is? It is most likely because of gender expectations that women are "weaker" and could not possibly rape a man. You won't get an argument with me on these things. I am feminist, egalitarian, etc. Many things. And it's not necessarily men always providing for the family. Women as a breadwinner or sole breadwinner are on the rise. So the expectation of men to provide for the family has gone down. And still, many of these problems stem from the gender expectations of women, which damage men in these ways, no?


This is the same arguments you've made above, so I'm simply give the same responses again.

You're right in that cultural expectations on men is going down, but you can say the same for women.
Both are getting better, but neither have reached the end yet. Both of them still need pushing and help to get there.
Jannah said
I'll respond here since it's the proper thread. Well I don't ignore the vile parts of religion, I just recognize that not everybody chooses to act on them. There are religious people who are capable of being decent, even if it does take massive cherry-picking to get there. I'd rather have decent half-assed followers than a bunch of Bible literalist fundies.


We're in agreement here.
I'd like to re-post a clarification I made in the last thread...

Magic Magnum said Now to clarify, often times when this debate happens people confused my strong disliking of Religion for a strong disliking for religious people.
I do not dislike people who are Religious, my issue is not with them. But with the foundation of the Religion itself, the fact something that has no evidence to support not only causes so many people to regard it as fact, but has been known as either the cause, or the tool used for many if not all of the most barbaric acts in human history.
Jannah said
I think it's also worth noting that the drug was probably given to adults before this and children will often to react to things differently.


True. It's one thing to test on a willing and consenting adult.
Having children be test subjects would be highly frowned upon and is probably illegal.
Even if said child is consenting purely from their own free will.

Though I don't doubt they have some way of testing the effects on children, but we can't be sure how much of that kind of testing has been done yet since it hasn't even been released yet. In america no less who has even lower standards than Canada... and Canada even had drugs/medicine go bad time to time.
natsumehack said
So i am typically always singing a song to you?


No :P
But disagreeing with me/calling what I say lies is something you've done before.

And it also isn't in my character to be trying to please people.
© 2007-2026
BBCode Cheatsheet