Avatar of Intrepid
  • Last Seen: 10 mos ago
  • Joined: 12 yrs ago
  • Posts: 4093 (0.92 / day)
  • VMs: 0
  • Username history
    1. Intrepid 12 yrs ago

Status

Recent Statuses

10 yrs ago
When your internet is out, you ponder why you spend so much time on it. When it comes back again, you ignore any deep, profound discoveries you make about it taking up time and go right back to it.
8 likes

Bio

User has no bio, yet

Most Recent Posts

<Snipped quote by Intrepid>

Yeeeeeeaaahhhh! Java's a super fun language. And it has automatic garbage collection, which is the best thing ever.


I can only do basic stuff right now, like take user input and manipulate it to output something new or in a different format.
<Snipped quote by Intrepid>

Is that an unreasonable goal?


I have no idea. I know I can't crack it.
Have I mentioned that I am learning java? Because I am. And it's not that bad, at least not yet.
<Snipped quote by Intrepid>

The density of such an artifact must be unparalleled.


Nigh indestructible. But we need a way to safely destroy it.
<Snipped quote by Intrepid>

Could you please provide the molecular details of Xallum?


It's a chemical combination of resources commonly used by the IA and is incredibly unstable. In fact, it seems to be the polar opposite to the metal containing it in terms of its molecular makeup. It is essentially a large mass of neutrons with minimal charged particles, whereas the metal seems to have had all of its electron shells collapsed onto the nucleus of the atom, essentially rendering all the atoms to be in actual contact with one another. I'd kill for the ability to produce that.
<Snipped quote by Armed Forces>

Do tell.


Pure Xallum contained at such immense pressures that the catastrophic chemical reaction between the components has not been allowed to fully take place. And the metal, being tough enough to hold it soundly, is something we couldn't even crack open if we tried. Not that we want to.
<Snipped quote by Armed Forces>

This can probably be considered transformative. But unless the image itself is the art (as opposed to being a piece of a larger project considered the "artwork"), it's fair for you to use. If you're just printing a picture someone is selling, then that would be in violation of copyright law.
e.g. If someone is selling portraits or photos, you can't. If someone took a picture of their bike and you want to use that bike image, it should be fine.
It's also possible that even if it is artwork, if they're giving it away, you should be able to use it. If they're selling it, this would still perhaps be considered transformative but would break the terms of use.


The images are the art being used on the sleeves, the only alteration is a bit of cropping to fit them. And the image source was on Pinterest when I found it.
Say I want to order customized sleeves for cards, and the images I am going to request come from places like Pinterest. This falls under fair use and I can use these images, right?
<Snipped quote by Intrepid>

I was thinkin the alien but good enough.

<Snipped quote by Techspert>

Hpmh


I was thinking HOLY MOLY IT'S BEEN A WHILE. GOOD TO TALK TO YOU AGAIN, WOW
<Snipped quote by Ignacious>

Good. They'll tear each other apart otherwise.

<Snipped quote by Intrepid>

Cars 2 is underrated.


It's rated low while being rated what it deserves.
© 2007-2026
BBCode Cheatsheet