Avatar of K-97
  • Last Seen: 17 days ago
  • Old Guild Username: KB97
  • Joined: 12 yrs ago
  • Posts: 808 (0.18 / day)
  • VMs: 0
  • Username history
    1. K-97 12 yrs ago
  • Latest 10 profile visitors:

Status

User has no status, yet

Bio

User has no bio, yet

Most Recent Posts

Kill Bones said
E3's been a shitshow for yearsBut at least we might get something about Beast Souls


I thought Project Beast wasn't even a Souls game?
Doivid said
This thread stayed remarkably on-topic.




Halo said
I have no idea. I don't understand it! :P I assumed you did, as I know you have a mathematical background, and the rules discussed in the video are essentially those that are in place in the study of mathematical topology. The idea is that any two objects that can be morphed into one another without puncturing or ripping the "material" are the same - as long as they're transformed into eachother through continuous deformation. A donut and a coffee mug? They're the same, 'cause they both only have one hole (donut in the centre, mug in the handle) and can be morphed into one another without puncturing or ripping. It's a huge area of study and I'm woefully clueless on it, honestly - but I need to be clued up on it in order to study theoretical physics, particularly string theory. I mean, spacetime itself is a 4-dimensional manifold, and string theory does some crazy shit with multidimensional space... bosonic string theory requires there to be 26 dimensions and superstring theory requires there to be 10.Sorry if I've missed a joke you were making or something, or am repeating stuff you're already aware of. I decided to take the post at face value xD


Do you mind explaining Manifolds to me? I remember reading about them at one point (can't remember why?) but I didn't get them 100%.

natsumehack said
That is one possible outcome, another is you don't exist in what is considered existence, yet at the same time you are in existence, so in other words, you become what you have made, a paradox in of it's self.


Oh right I see what you mean now, you're saying they would exist within the universe despite the factors which brought about their existence no longer exist. Okay I understand but still, what prevents their death?
In Veritas 12 yrs ago Forum: Advanced Roleplay
Oh oh I want to join this, anyone made a claim on water?
I've been delaying making a CS for this, I'll do so quickly.
Smiral said
This thread is the equivalent of a forum bong hit.


^
Isn't this literally most threads by Nat?

natsumehack said
How about this idea, alt universe's exist, but each has there own time line/flow, that is independent of one another.The idea that you would exist outside existent comes from the idea that the timeline try to repair it's self but because of how your action cause more problems, the space fabric of your own existences tares meaning you are dead, in this timeline the one you came from, but you yourself as a being is not effected by the changes this cause, rather you are a exception that has occurred to try to keep this timeline from collapsing into it's self like a time black hole.In this timeline where you killed yourself you are immortal as stuff don't effect you normally, but in other timelines of different alt universe's where you alt past and future past both still live, you can be killed as the timeline of this universe wasn't the one that you paradox, and still effects you as if you didn't kill yourself.


My natural question is how would you exist outside of existence, what would sustain your consciousness?. You would no longer be a part of the natural fabric of spacetime. Heck TBH your idea could be true simply because we have absolutely no idea what could happen, but then because of this any and all ideas about what could happen outside of existence are valid. Assuming you remain a being, even tough that requires existing, I suppose you would be unkillable. But then simply because you can't interact with existence, timelines and all seeing as they are a part of existence and you have no way of rejoining existence, if you are even conscious then you would experience literal nothingness. No time. No space. Just nothing. It would be hell.
For once Nat an interesting, albeit trolly and attention seeking as always, question.

Sometime ago I read a few theories on time travel to the past, some argue that time travel is possible but the universe prevents paradoxes from occurring. For example lets say you travel back in time and try to kill yourself, ''fate'' will cause you to fail and whatever does occur will match with your own memories of the past. Then there's the idea that time travel to the past is simply impossible, again to prevent the occurrence of paradoxes. There is also this idea:

Giygas said
How? Wouldn't you just disappear from existence?


That you could kill your past self but by changing the past, your future no longer exists and everything associated with it is erased from existence, include yourself at the very moment you kill yourself. Some also argue that due to this by even travelling in time you would create a new timeline and therefore eliminate yourself and your future from existence immediately which is a different version of the time travel is impossible argument.

Furthermore it could be said that if you believe every choice or action causes a branch in time, then travelling back in time merely creates another branch in time allowing you to kill yourself and for you to remain in existence. But you wouldn't be immortal as your past self would still exist, albeit in a timeline where you didn't go back i time.

The only way I could see this even occurring is if time travel isn't really time travel but rather going to another universe which so happens to exactly match our universe's past, in which case you could murder your ''past self'' but it wouldn't really be your past self and you wouldn't be immortal.
Finally, you revived the story. Don't bail on us again.

Looking forward to it.
Well congratulations Drakel, now if you make some sort of grand return you'll be a God among Nerds.
© 2007-2026
BBCode Cheatsheet