Avatar of Pepperm1nts
  • Last Seen: 4 mos ago
  • Joined: 10 yrs ago
  • Posts: 2248 (0.60 / day)
  • VMs: 3
  • Username history
    1. Pepperm1nts 10 yrs ago
  • Latest 10 profile visitors:

Status

Recent Statuses

5 mos ago
Current Remember to disrupt any and all instances of peeing and pooing by members of the exploiter class. #resist
2 yrs ago
Do not allow the bourgeoisie to pee or poo in peace.
3 likes

Bio

User has no bio, yet

Most Recent Posts

Most of the canon for Russia is, sadly, not IC.

This is the gist of it, though:

During the final years of WWI, the Russian Empire withdrew its forces and squashed the communist rebellion at home. This means that Nicholas II was never overthrown, and the civil war was prevented/delayed. Nicholas II would go to rule over Russia for decades, adopting a deeply anti-communist stance that resulted in the suppression of any kind of workers movement, or threat to the Tsarist regime. He rolled back some of the limitations that had been placed on his power in the early 1900s and Russia became a full-on autocracy again. His son followed his footsteps, but was not as strong of a leader, which allowed for communists to slowly resurface again and chip away at his power, culminating with his assassination a few years before the RP start date.

The assassination of the Tsar threw Russia into civil war and split it up into a multitude or warring states. The Imperial government withdrew to Petrograd/St.Petersburg and the surviving heir was brought forward to become the new Tsar. Since then, Imperial Russia has more or less been in a standoff against other Russian states, mainly Moscow. In Moscow, the children of an old Imperial general came to power and turned it into another Tsardom, but those are not legitimate heirs because they aren't related to the Romanovs. Ukraine became independent after the death of the Tsar and became a Hetmanate. In Akangelsk there are some socialists in power. Nothing else on that side of the Urals is controlled by a player, but basically imagine it as a big mess of competing states of varying ideologies, in constant war. In between all that there are warlords and criminals doing stuff.

Japan has a foothold on the east side of the Urals, and China has been snooping around getting ready to invade Siberia. Beyond that, there isn't much else to say.

As for your idea... You're free to do whatever you want, so you can play as a small group if that's what you're interested in, but if you can you should probably do something a little bigger than that. In my experience, limiting yourself will result in you running into a lot of dead-ends with what you can realistically do on a scale that small. Don't be afraid to snatch one of the Russian states. You can change the borders a bit if you want, as long as it's within reason.

If you want to ask specifics about Russia, you can PM me if you want.
If anyone still takes Dave Rubin serious after the Joe Rogan podcast I feel bad for them. Dave Rubin is the epitome of an intellectual lightweight. He's an idiot and a sell-out. It saddens me that we're at a point where people that dumb are idolized.
EDIT: I just realized I don't give enough of a shit to argue about it so nevermind this post.
The last good Saints Row was the second.
I don't understand the claim being made. Are you saying that because America is big, you don't see many foreigners? If so, that's hilariously wrong. You can't go out in America without seeing foreigners. The only places without foreigners are isolated, rural places where no one bothers to go and everyone knows each other because the population is 53.
I guess I'm in the minority who thinks the new Spider-Man game looks shitty. Nothing about it looks exceptional to me. It looks pretty, but the gameplay is more of the same. It reminds me of Prototype, except way less interesting.
That quote is blind patriotism and it's toxic. There's nothing wrong with speaking multiple languages, being proud of your home country, or practicing the culture of that place. No one is any less American for doing those things. I'm all for assimilation and I think everyone who comes into a new country should do their best to assimilate, but if they want to hold on to a piece of their original culture, or their original language, they can do that and it doesn't make them any less American. In my book, if you're an American, you're an American. End of story.
Cyberpunk 2077 is the only game I'm excited for.
@Burning Kitty

Dude, if you work retail it's your job to help customers, so if anyone should have put in the effort to facilitate communication, it's you.
Yeah, nah, a pinkie promise means nothing.

It's definitely great optics for Trump, though. Tons of people who don't understand that literally all Trump got was a non-binding pinkie promise will think of him as the president who solved North Korea, but really he accomplished basically nothing. Calling it a deal is generous.

It's hilarious how the Iran deal is seen as impotent but a pinkie promise isn't. Like, really, get real.

And for the record, I'm all for peace with North Korea. I just find the congnative dissonance surrounding this whole thing funny. The very same people who thought of the Iran deal as having been impotent, now think a pinkie promise isn't. The very same people who thought the Iran deal didn't go far enough and rejected it - finding it preferable to scrap the whole thing because they thought it was that bad - have now adopted the "any deal is a good deal" stance with regards to the North Korea """deal""".

And by the way, what politicians thought of the Iran deal means nothing. They're politicians. Why you are bringing up their concerns as if they matter on any level is beyond me. The Iran deal was working as intended, and while it did not place permanent limitations of the Iranian program, it was the best we were realistically going to get. Now we have nothing and no chance of getting Iran back to the negotiating table, so it's funny how the criticism is always that the deal only delayed Iran. Now there's nothing delaying them or serving as a stepping stone towards something better, so.. uh, great job?

EDIT: Also, again, nothing in the North Korean deal is binding in any way, shape or form. At best, the North Korean "deal" is as useless as you say the Iran deal was. And hell, at least the Iran deal had provisions actively enforced and monitored by the international community.
© 2007-2024
BBCode Cheatsheet