Avatar of rezay
  • Last Seen: 5 yrs ago
  • Joined: 5 yrs ago
  • Posts: 419 (0.22 / day)
  • VMs: 1
  • Username history
    1. rezay 5 yrs ago
  • Latest 10 profile visitors:

Status

Recent Statuses

5 yrs ago
Reading books while driving is a good way to expand your knowledge
1 like
5 yrs ago
I hate the part of the world that uses "lollies" to refer to candies
2 likes
5 yrs ago
Imperials go home
2 likes
5 yrs ago
"What if you told a joke and somebody laughed?"
2 likes
5 yrs ago
I enjoy peanut butter and jelly sandwiches, but hold the peanut butter and jelly. Hate condiments on my sandwiches.
4 likes

Bio

User has no bio, yet

Most Recent Posts

@AdorableSaucerSo if someone takes an action that lasts a longer amount of time and another takes an action that lasts a shorter amount of time, the time that ellapses in that turn is the time it takes the person doing the longer action to complete that action? If that makes sense

If so, what is the person with the shorter action doing in the meantime in-universe? I suppose that would mean that the shorter each action you do is, the more of them you can take? Or it allows you to take an additional action to compensate. Or is it just an impromptu "wing it" sitaution
@Dark CloudI'm a corrupt Republic that doesn't like mutants unless they have something useful to trade or are dumb enough to exploit
Hmmm, generations of inbreeding and general Ogreish shenaniganry.


Sounds like a lot of fun
On a side note, I expected the RNJ to be more populous, thus I made it a Republic. I kinda like this setup, though. It's like they don't quite know what they're doing, because they don't (not entirely). They've salvaged all their ideas of popular governance from fragments of old-world sources, so it works
@Dark Cloud If you want, extrapolate with math for wherever your group started, for me I began with 80, ended up at a population of 7-800 without accounting for death, and then accounted for death (civil war happened, predators, disease, so on), and I deduced 400 or so was reasonable

Think of how many children a woman has each generation on average, to start. Account for relevant factors. So on.

More of an estimate anyways
@Dark CloudGM told me mine, in the interest check. Safe to say yours is probably going to be similar, or maybe a bit lower if ogres require considerably more upkeep than humans
@AdorableSaucerBy the way, how much time passes per turn?
@Dark CloudYou had the audacity to sleep :p

No reason particularly, but I'll take any opportunity to make a Monty Python reference when I'm bored

*Not even a correct one at that

youtu.be/M9DCAFUerzs
There we go
@Dark CloudDon't make me taunt you a second time

: P
@rezay The "Oopsie" in the character tab works just fine. No worries!

As for the first post, you're spot on! Considering the content of your post, I will kick your sheet off with a population of 400 to start off with. Does that sound alright?


Yes, the number would probably be somewhere between that and 1,000, in broad terms. They came out of the vault*BUNKER... with something like 80. Considering like 4 children for 40 women in the first generation (some with less some with more), that's an increase of 160, total of 240. Second generation, 480 children born, but they'll be replacing the large number of casualties from the civil war/revolt thing they did. Add in natural deaths to predators, disease, exposure, and people leaving for whatever reason, and 4-500 is reasonable. For the sake of balance 4 is fine.
© 2007-2026
BBCode Cheatsheet