Avatar of Sanctus Spooki
  • Last Seen: 6 yrs ago
  • Joined: 7 yrs ago
  • Posts: 734 (0.28 / day)
  • VMs: 8
  • Username history
    1. Sanctus Spooki 7 yrs ago

Status

Recent Statuses

6 yrs ago
Current You bastards killed Momu194!
6 yrs ago
Holy Cow, guys I think the bot might actually be sentient. I might actually cry at this beautiful sight... all it needed was a friend! Really though I'm amazed it actually shut up...
1 like
6 yrs ago
You can try all you want. I know I am far too biased to ever believe otherwise.
6 yrs ago
If you are concerned with power, popularity or control, yes your reputation matters. Regarding truth, morality, and such, less so. Off topic, but CREED II is gonna be awesome.
2 likes
6 yrs ago
Well, that depends on what you are concerned with.

Bio

User has no bio, yet

Most Recent Posts

Alright you win I just terrified my cats with all my laughing.

Who could prepare themselves for a nice woody?
Alrighty then, Rapeface McDinobot, I'm out

are you in though?
Sometimes when i'm alone at night, I like to hang Christmas ornaments from my nipples while eating a bowl of mashed up wheatbix


go on...
I'd say I'm interested, but it looks like you already have more than enough interest going on here... I suppose I'll wait for the OOC before making up my mind.
Just because you were mentioned in a post saying that people have a tendency to label anything they dont like as a Mary Sue doesn't mean it is about you.
Just because the two fears you mentioned were both fears of my character in a thread we were both apart of doesn't mean it is about me.

Also again, by personal bias, I did not mean a grudge, I meant that the Character rubs you in the wrong way. That could mean that you think they are a rip-off, that they are not well done, that you just hate characters with glowing eyes or the name could just bother you. Again and again you continue to try and make this all about you.

When you try to insinuate that I call characters Mary Sues just to spite their owners, you do more than just insult my intelligence and my honor. You also attempt to degrade the very standards to which writers hold themselves. After all, if anyone who calls anyone else's a character a "Mary Sue" is only doing it to serve a grudge, then what else, I wonder, serves this grudge? When someone in the Advanced section says your spelling and grammar are inadequate for his RP, I suppose you can convince yourself that he only said it because he doesn't like you; because he wanted to drive you away from his thread, but was too cowardly to express that fact directly and suffer the social ramifications. And when you're booted from a game for foul behavior against other players, of course it'll be easy to blame them; they wanted you out, and it's impossible that you brought that punishment upon yourself. Clearly they only did it to hurt you.

Really, under this logic you could be the worst player on the Guild, literally the worst writer here, but because everyone else is secretly out to get you, you'll never have to improve yourself through introspection. You'll never need to acknowledge your own faults and shortcomings because people are only pointing them out for the sake of hurting you.

In other words, you want a way for writers to be immune to criticism, and that doesn't fly with me.

So I guess you're right. I'm "defensive" because you're making up lies about me, but I'm mostly invested in this exchange because your backwards arguments make far worse implications for the hobby as a whole.


Honestly get over yourself. At least my ego is confined to the spam section.

Edit: Peace out bitches! Imma exit stage left before things start to really get out of hand.
LMAO yes they were, because I was using my character as an example of how it is easy to take one thing out of context, when you don't seek to actually understand something, and only care about sounding right.

Yes, you are the one who is being defensive. Stop trying to make it seem like I'm making you sound like an ass.

The fact that you literally put my post through word counter says enough about who is getting more emotionally invested in this conversation, btw.
It sounds to me like you are being completely defensive over this. Personal Bias was the personal Bias against the character.

As I said before people who need things explained in explicit detail.

Now that was directed at you (in this case, not the previous)

Edit: Should I explain what I meant by 'that' as well?

Edit 2: Personal Bias a.k.a. this character rubs me the wrong way.
Edit2: Well this section of the forum is called "Roleplaying Discussion"


I think we all know where this 'discussion' was leading.

I never said that his points were wrong, and I never said that he was manipulating anything for a personal vendetta.

He was the one who took it personally, I merely mentioned him because it was his post that spurred my own, to try and provide a counter view to some of the arguments he had made. He was the one who chose to get offended.
© 2007-2024
BBCode Cheatsheet