Skallagrim

Arena Chat Thread

Well I guess but honestly there is going to be a divide already between really good fighters and the average. I would rather face the best than the average.

Arena Chat Thread

Because we know no matter how many apply to be a tourney people don't always post. You can make it 100 or 150 per each person who makes at least 2/3 posts before dropping out. The idea of winning a tourney should be worth entering. Or make the tourney worth X amount for first second place. So perhaps 1000/750 for 1/2nd place.

Arena Chat Thread

I was thinking on that melon. For a tournament beside individual points if you win a tourney out right I think 250 per everyone who engaged in at least 1 post. Thus 8 players all posting a stance gives the winner 2,000 points.

Arena Chat Thread

I would never judge a fight I was in.

Arena Chat Thread

HoR had issues with judges until they set like 2-3 that everyone agreed on to be completely impartial and one whose word was absolutely. Because we all know people accept a call without question. I will be honest there are some people I would not wanting to judge a fight I was engaged in.

Arena Chat Thread

Works for me. Then the hard work begins. Setting judges is not easy.

Arena Chat Thread

You should have a deadline on the debate. Perhaps Friday?

Arena Chat Thread

Well the loser getting points allows them to have points. Personally I could care less I am just trying to give incentive to those lacking skill until they gain it.

Arena Chat Thread

If you bet the max 50 points you lose the 25 from fighting plus 25 from your stash. If you only bet 25 you lose your partcipation points. If you bet and lose you lose points

Arena Chat Thread

I say a flat rate if people build up points they can wager upto an additional number of points upto say 50 max? Of course they cannot bid/ wager points they don't have