Avatar of The Nexerus
  • Last Seen: 4 yrs ago
  • Joined: 12 yrs ago
  • Posts: 4060 (0.89 / day)
  • VMs: 5
  • Username history
    1. The Nexerus 12 yrs ago

Status

User has no status, yet

Bio

User has no bio, yet

Most Recent Posts

<Snipped quote by The Nexerus>

No you didn't.


Yes, I did.

Punctuation, and grammar in general, is the difference between knowing your shit and knowing you're shit.


With that example cited, I'm not about to get into a war of anecdotes. Removing the distinction between 'you're' and 'your' lessens communication in at least one instance, and cannot possibly bolster communication in any instance. The distinction between the two is therefore practically valid.

If a mistake is so commonly made, it means that the distinction no longer has a meaningful function. Your/You're can (and just very well might) melt into a single word and it will not harm the language in any way. Your just being pedantic.


I just outlined a valid example of a way in which such a change would harm the language. 'You're' and 'Your' have entirely different meanings, both of which can make sense in context and convey two entirely dissimilar messages. Any fundamental change to English grammar would introduce ambiguity. It is for the sake of maximizing the English language's purpose, as a medium of communication, that I correct grammatical mistakes. Stuffiness doesn't factor into it.

If you want an example of a grammatical rule that IS entirely unhelpful in maximizing communication, go find a grizzled old grammarian who insists that sentences shouldn't end in prepositions.
It isn't laziness, it's people realizing conflating the two words is convenient and the next step of evolution for the word-- you can understand what is being said based on the context of the sentence.


Neglecting to correctly distinguish between 'you're' and 'your' is not linguistic evolution, it is laziness and/or ignorance that denigrates clarity of meaning. Punctuation, and grammar in general, is the difference between knowing your shit and knowing you're shit. In your case, and Depressed's case, it's definitely the contraction. You're likely just a troll: @Depressed is the actual offender.

if ud rly prfr ppl tlk lk ths thn fn, your fre t spk how u lk—but your speaking that way does not change the rules of the English language, and your freedom to speak however you like is attached to your freedom to be objectively wrong.
The shower head in my house is really shitty, so I guess that.
Elayne scoffed at Hector's well intentioned off-hand sexism, but nonetheless obliged his offer to take a breather. Why do a lot of heavy lifting that someone is eager to do for you? Settling as cozily as she could into an alcove, Elayne withdrew a small book from her bag and relaxed for awhile, reading absent-mindedly, not drawing any meaning from the words but more so just glancing her eyes over them. She might have seemed quite lazy to some of the others, taking a rest while Hector and the Elves worked, but the moment of calm served a practical purpose, allowing the young mage's magicka to replenish. If there was another small army of draugr behind the debris, she'd be useless against them unless she allowed her body to replenish after the firestorm she'd conjured earlier.

Once the group set off again, Elayne relished the opportunity during the trudge through the dark tunnel to inspect her contemporary's magelight. It had improved, evidently; she must have either learned to manipulate it better all of her own accord or been given a few quick pointers by one of the other magic users. Elayne hoped it was the latter—resorting to trial and error was entirely pointless when there were plenty of potential tutors around to draw from. Besides that, manipulation of magic was always a dangerous endeavour. When a mage adjusted her handling of a spell, there was also the possibility it'd morph into something else entirely. It would be quite embarrassing for Merci, and quite painful for whoever was right in front of her at the time in the close quarters of the tunnel, if her efforts to improve her magelight's brightness turned it into a fireball.

Once the party reached a mercifully wider open area, what seemed to be an old library, Elayne's inquisitive nature in inspecting the room's many scroll-covered tables led to her forgetting entirely about the small cache of treasure that the others were already looting. Once she'd found the scrolls in too poor condition to learn anything from, Elayne got around to grabbing her share of what remained. There were a small few amethysts and a couple bits of gold left, as well as a much more interesting prize: a dagger, glimmering with some sort of enchantment. Though she was not a warrior, Elayne figured having a blade stashed somewhere easy to grab could definitely come in handy in close quarters like those of the Nordic tomb she now found herselfdeep inside. She slipped the dagger into her robes, leaving what remained of the valuable baubles to the others.

When Balen spoke, Elayne gave a quick shake of her head. "Nothing I've seen so far is even slightly legible, unfortunately. Best leave it all alone. All risk for no reward. Even if there aren't any traps, it'd be a waste of time."
Change your fucking avatar.
I wasn't depressed until I opened this thread.


Read it in reverse and you won't be depressed any more.
Grammatical consistency is something that is entirely irrelevant, and only exists because people believe in it's importance.


Language itself only exists because people believe it's important. The English language isn't a product of nature, so obviously its rules aren't either. Also, this is an appeal to nature fallacy.

When viewed with any significant historical lens, it's clear that language is constantly evolving.
[@Dracas]


Language's constant state of flux is not a reason to defy the structural rules governing language, but rather to reinforce them in order to sustain intelligibility in spite of the change. What is considered acceptable occasionally changes; that does not for any reason make it wise to abandon all rules determining what is or is not acceptable. Words are spelled a certain way. Words can only be put together in a certain way. Spelling a word incorrectly or organizing a sentence incorrectly introduces ambiguity, which is antithetical to the entire purpose of languages.
*you're

Also, when using ellipses, it is stylistically best to use three dots. Two seems like you meant to place a period but accidentally doubled up, and four or more is excessive.
© 2007-2026
BBCode Cheatsheet