
Joshua15555 said
For the US, it depends.Hundreds of tactical nuclear warheads were to be used in the event of a third world war in Europe. Both sides had plans to use said weaponry to great effectiveness in order to eliminate entire regimental sized formations and great gaps and openings to conduct offenses into.The combined overall nuclear warhead count of NATO was smaller than Russia's however NATO had more medium/long-range ballistic missiles with better guidance packages than the Russians had. What this brings into play is that the Russians would have been unable to utilize nuclear weaponry without some kind of major event that would seriously impact not the WP, but the SFSR itself. This could be anything from NATO troops (For some dumb reason) advancing into the SFSR, or maybe NATO troops on the verge of taking a major city (St. Petersberg, Moscow, etc).Models created about a possible nuclear exchange during the later-Cold War end up with a NATO pyrrhic victory at best.
Raxacoricofallapatorius said
kinky bastard
Derpestein said
I want in on this
Raxacoricofallapatorius said
Bite me unicorn boy
The Nexerus said
I don't think there are a lot of different ways to use nuclear missiles.
Raxacoricofallapatorius said
I was gonna just draw you as a swirl with cat ears but I ran out of fucks.