Avatar of Willy Vereb

Status

Recent Statuses

10 yrs ago
I'll be away on a trip for a few days so my activity will be low
11 yrs ago
I'll be on vacation for a few days so my activity will be low

Bio

User has no bio, yet

Most Recent Posts



I still need to fill out the history part and this NRP flies like a jet plane.
I added a few things including proper army numbers, a latter for which I mostly looked at the current US military as the basis and divided it by a certain number. So if you think the result is too high then you may have underestimated the size of your military.
...or don't spend 20% of your GDP on them like my country and the USA does.
As I said the Bundeswehr currently is just tiny in comparison because they simply have no need for anything larger. Things would be different in a world like this, though.

And yeah, I still haven't filled out my history part but is it such a big deal?
I mean I practically already told you what's relevant about it.
I can fill that out later.
@IluvatarI don't think many nations can currently influence on the global scale.
What with previous relations breaking down and everything still being a mess.
In the modern world it's easier to be a "great power" than in a setting like this.

Besides, with great power comes great responsibility.
BTW, I wanted to mention this in Neo Hungaria's profile but I couldn't find the appropriate place for it.
Basically the overgrown mustaches are enjoying a new reneissance in Neo Hungaria.


Imagine a nation where mustaches like this are almost like the norm.
@Willy Vereb
Do you suppose any form of agreements or treaties would have been made between Neo-Hungaria and the GEC before 2050?
Sure, why not?
20 years is a long time.

<Snipped quote by MetalLover>

What allowed, large, solid-state lasers, tank rail guns, or both?
Both are apparently allowed.
Solid-state lasers aren't THAT big and decades of development can certainly shrink them down.
We already have laser point defenses thanks to Rheinmetall. They are sure not as OP as portrayed in sci-fi. They are a nice way to compliment your already long list of countermeasures.

As for Railguns...well, they have issues in general.
Power requirements (same as big lasers in the MW range), wear on the rails (IIRC about 30 shots prior to replacement) and issues with the ammunition options.
Actually, I think I may stick with the "conventional" cannons.
The navy is interested in railguns because it'd give them a cheaper alternative to missiles and rocket-assisted projectiles when bombarding from range. The raw velocity of the projectile turns it into an explosive.

Well, just because many modern militaries have low numbers it doesn't mean you have to be.
They have tiny armies because they don't use it.
Look at the USA, they have millions of soldiers.
In comparison Germany doesn't even have a tenth of this even though their population is around 30-40% of USA.
then look at WW2 when Nazi Germany had almost as many soldiers as the USA during the peak of war, an even before they had more soldiers than the USA currently employs.
It's a matter of necessity.
Post-WW3 atmosphere won't be a kind world so I suppose every decently sized nation can reason a few million soldiers to themselves.

<Snipped quote by Willy Vereb>

While I do agree with this, the thing is, they will still most likely be bitch slapped by the 2 Asian Superpowers. The Caliphate, the GEC, and the Soviet Empire will probably beat them down.
I already said that I am more or less just nitpicking since the only thing that matters is the RP.
And if we are at it, Brits will be also hard-pressed against Neo Hungaria if it would ever come to war.
But oh well, we'll see when it comes to it.

<Snipped quote by Willy Vereb>

Railguns are fine, energy weapons are not. Early formed lasers are fine though, which i assume the vehicle mounted ones are.
Tank mounted railguns change things in a big way.
I suppose I'll change my tank profile a tiny bit.
And yes, it's a big solid-state laser system, exactly what the US was developing for a while.
Working on the military bits for now.
I may quickly cook up something for the history, though.
<Snipped quote by raja1020>

Avoiding war is an incredibly simple endeavour: have a powerful military, and don't declare war. If two people are wailing on each other with sticks and there's a third guy with an even bigger stick watching them, the third fellow isn't going to be attacked, assuming that either of the first two have an IQ above 70. It would be suicide for either of the warring parties to decide, for no reason other than 'The British Isles are nice this time of year!', to waste their resources on assaulting a non-party to the conflict. This is an incredibly basic idea that should not be difficult for you to understand. As for a nuclear strike: if you had read the OP, you'd know that there weren't any.

<Snipped quote by raja1020>

1. The pound sterling is already an international reserve currency. It's the third most traded financial denomination after the Euro and the U.S. dollar.

2. Europe was ravaged by war and the United States was ravaged by war so badly that it divided into thirds (or is it fourths?). When countries (or evil empires, in the EU's case) are under extreme duress like that, no one wants to touch their currency with a ten foot pole. That would leave the pound sterling the most likely new international reserve purely by consequence. Factor in that when money leaves one place it has to go somewhere else, and that Britain was a most excellent place for this freed up capital to go, and it seems like it would be a fantastical oddity for the pound sterling to not become the post-war world's reserve.
The problem with this idea is that you still magically aren't interested in one of the greatest wars of all time.
Also you are already part of the NATO and involved with EU.
While mending the latter is hardly difficult the former would be a far different case.
Really, the point of this setting is to have all nations start from relative ruins (even if they are pretty well-off nowadays).
Saying that you were the laughing third while the entire world was slugging it out is rather unfair.

@MonkeypantsI think Mihndar already has China.
Also even though it's 2050 we only have slightly futuristic modern weaponry.
No energy weapons or such craze.
Possibly even tank-mounted railguns are stretching it.
Although wait a minute...
@MetalLoverI know I asked technology before but I wonder would you allow vehicles mounting railguns?
If not, would it be acceptable for naval vessels (where the research is currently going on)?
Also how do you feel about large sized vehicle-mounted 1-10MW lasers (used mostly for interception and anti-aircraft purposes).
<Snipped quote by Willy Vereb>

I have comparatively little interest in Europe. If I do expand in Europe through the course of the roleplay, it would only be to take back Moldova/the Baltic countries.

The Caliphate and the post-American countries probably have the most to fear.

Which countries would still have nuclear arsenals?
I thought you already have them? I mean based on the map it seems obvious you have Ukraine, for example.
And that you are my direct neighbor.

As for which countries still have nuclear arsenals it's a bad way to ask it.
Because there's no reason a country wouldn't work on their atomic project.
Actually, Neo Hungaria built nukes after WW3.


© 2007-2026
BBCode Cheatsheet