Hidden 8 yrs ago Post by PKMNB0Y
Raw
GM
Avatar of PKMNB0Y

PKMNB0Y Archer Inferno

Member Seen 6 hrs ago

@VarionusNW: Er... Well, there's nothing wrong with the character, but the backstory makes her feel a bit too... I dunno, serious for this RP's mood?
Hidden 8 yrs ago Post by VarionusNW
Raw
Avatar of VarionusNW

VarionusNW Nobody In Particular

Member Seen 1 mo ago

@VarionusNW: Er... Well, there's nothing wrong with the character, but the backstory makes her feel a bit too... I dunno, serious for this RP's mood?


Yea, I had a feeling that you would have issues with that. I typically create characters with intent for character development, and try to have a reason for every part of a character's personality. I could tell that for this RP, the norm was characters that were inherently absurd, created as silly characters with funny traits. The thing is, I don't really express my more comedic characters in that way, since my style of comedy is less inherent absurdity, and more subtlety and character interaction.

TL;DR: While the character seems serious, I believe that the comedic aspects of the character will be more prevalent within the IC.
Hidden 8 yrs ago Post by Vee
Raw
Avatar of Vee

Vee

Member Seen 8 yrs ago

*Cheers in the distance to let VarionusNW's character to be accepted.*

Hidden 8 yrs ago Post by VarionusNW
Raw
Avatar of VarionusNW

VarionusNW Nobody In Particular

Member Seen 1 mo ago

#FreeSmith @Vee @PKMNB0Y
Hidden 8 yrs ago Post by Lucius Cypher
Raw
Avatar of Lucius Cypher

Lucius Cypher Looking For Group

Member Seen 13 days ago

*Also cheers for Vari's character to be accepted.*

Hidden 8 yrs ago Post by Jedly
Raw
Avatar of Jedly

Jedly Espresso Drinker

Member Seen 7 yrs ago

3x Laugh Laugh
Hidden 8 yrs ago Post by Grey
Raw
Avatar of Grey

Grey

Member Seen 2 yrs ago

I have an idea for this.

Do you still have room for facetanks?
Hidden 8 yrs ago Post by PKMNB0Y
Raw
GM
Avatar of PKMNB0Y

PKMNB0Y Archer Inferno

Member Seen 6 hrs ago

Hm... Alright, I think that everyone else seems to be in favor of it, so why not? =w=;;;;;;;;;

@Grey: I actually think that's the only archetype that we're missing rn lol.
Hidden 8 yrs ago Post by Rin
Raw
Avatar of Rin

Rin

Member Seen 2 hrs ago

Aw... Guess I'm going to have to sit this out then. :(
Hidden 8 yrs ago Post by PKMNB0Y
Raw
GM
Avatar of PKMNB0Y

PKMNB0Y Archer Inferno

Member Seen 6 hrs ago

Well, who said we were only gonna have one party? =3=

Also, who ever said two tanks was a bad thing?
Hidden 8 yrs ago Post by VitaVitaAR
Raw
Avatar of VitaVitaAR

VitaVitaAR King of Knights

Member Seen 3 hrs ago

We've got a few different types of characters still open though. ^^;

We don't have any offensive magic-users unless you count a summoner for one.
Hidden 8 yrs ago Post by VarionusNW
Raw
Avatar of VarionusNW

VarionusNW Nobody In Particular

Member Seen 1 mo ago

We've got a few different types of characters still open though. ^^;

We don't have any offensive magic-users unless you count a summoner for one.


Umm... excuse me. I'm pretty sure a spellsword counts as on offensive magic user. So, we technically have 2 offensive magic users.
Hidden 8 yrs ago Post by VitaVitaAR
Raw
Avatar of VitaVitaAR

VitaVitaAR King of Knights

Member Seen 3 hrs ago

I wasn't quite thinking that, though.

I was thinking more the full-focused mage type. Which we don't have an offensive-focused mage. ^^;
Hidden 8 yrs ago Post by Grey
Raw
Avatar of Grey

Grey

Member Seen 2 yrs ago

@Rin If you've already got a lot of your sheet done, I'd be fine with rolling a blaster mage instead since I haven't really touched the CS yet and I also have an idea for one of those.
Hidden 8 yrs ago Post by Rin
Raw
Avatar of Rin

Rin

Member Seen 2 hrs ago

@GreyI... Actually don't have anything done yet. ^^; Was pretty sick for the past few days and couldn't focus on doing much until today.

...If I went with a full caster they'd probably end up either as a walking nuke or a charlatan who actually knows barely any magic and just fakes their way through things with a bunch of low level utility spells anyways. XD
Hidden 8 yrs ago Post by Lucius Cypher
Raw
Avatar of Lucius Cypher

Lucius Cypher Looking For Group

Member Seen 13 days ago

@Rin If you've already got a lot of your sheet done, I'd be fine with rolling a blaster mage instead since I haven't really touched the CS yet and I also have an idea for one of those.


Grey we fucking talked about this. I did not spend five hours at work on my phone trying to find you Shota pics just for you to throw it all away to be a fucking blaster caster.
Hidden 8 yrs ago Post by Grey
Raw
Avatar of Grey

Grey

Member Seen 2 yrs ago

You're not my real dad.
Hidden 8 yrs ago Post by VarionusNW
Raw
Avatar of VarionusNW

VarionusNW Nobody In Particular

Member Seen 1 mo ago

I checked the existing character types, and found that what we have so far is: 2 archers/rangers, 1 bard, 1 summoner, 1 support/priest, 1 merchant, 2 warriors, 1 rogue, and 1 spellsword

7 offensive characters, 2 support characters, and 1 utility character.

In conclusion: We need more meatshields
Hidden 8 yrs ago Post by Rin
Raw
Avatar of Rin

Rin

Member Seen 2 hrs ago

...I can do meatshields if it comes down to it I guess. >.> <.<
Hidden 8 yrs ago Post by Lucius Cypher
Raw
Avatar of Lucius Cypher

Lucius Cypher Looking For Group

Member Seen 13 days ago

You're not my real dad.


Son, I'm only going to say this once. We do this the easy way or the hard way. It's your choice. In the Booty Warrior.
↑ Top
© 2007-2024
BBCode Cheatsheet