Avatar of Ellri
  • Last Seen: 3 yrs ago
  • Old Guild Username: Ellri
  • Joined: 12 yrs ago
  • Posts: 3731 (0.82 / day)
  • VMs: 5
  • Username history
    1. Ellri 12 yrs ago
  • Latest 10 profile visitors:

Status

Recent Statuses

7 yrs ago
Current Peace is a Lie, there is only Passion. Through Passion, I gain Strength. Through Strength, I gain Power. Through Power, I gain Victory. Through Victory, My Chains are Broken. The Force Shall Free Me.
3 likes
8 yrs ago
"Never was, never will be."
8 yrs ago
We find that our favorite damage type is collateral.
8 yrs ago
We do not corrupt mortals. We teach them enlightened self-interest.
8 yrs ago
Peace is a lie. There is only passion (for cookies).
2 likes

Bio

User has no interest in writing a bio yet.

Most Recent Posts

We'll be less active for a few days now. Just moved and haven't fixed net at our new place yet. We'll drop by occasionally when we can.
We'll be less active for a few days now. Just moved and haven't fixed net at our new place yet. We'll drop by occasionally when we can.
We'll be less active for a few days now. Just moved and haven't fixed net at our new place yet. We'll drop by occasionally when we can.
When the proposed tagging system is implemented, it would only be natural to have it possible for GM to remove tags as well as add them, right?

We agree with the above. adding extra sub-sections for group sizes would not be practical or provide a clean, uncluttered look. Besides, where some consider 3-5 to be small, others might have the numbers be 3-6 or 4-5 or... And some wouldn't just split it to large/small. Some would split it to small-medium-large, or perhaps tiny-small-medium-large-massive. There's simply too many ways to divide such up to have a clear system based on sections.

If anything, the more logical sub-division would be by RP genre. But just a quick look at the more common genres, and you see the same problem exists there. Too many.
It is, in our opinion, better to wait for the proposed RP tag system to be worked out.
We'll provide a review once your CS is further updated, taking in the bits Echo spoke of.
We've begun reviewing it, Mirth, but Echo's had a pretty trying day, so it might take a little time. its still in the same doc as last review.
pretty sure Sep hasn't created a summary of events yet. Not that there's all that many events to summarize anyways.

One thing we've been wondering, Cthulu... is the nick misspelled on purpose? Pretty sure the Lovecraftian mythos has it as "Cthulhu". At least our searches put it up as that.
Its a nice baby version you have as avatar.

We're currently working on a Collab in the mess hall (with FallenReaper), so that is one place you could have your doc appear.
That makes perfect sense to want to avoid.
Thanks, Lillian. We forgot about that.

If the own post delete function had been up, we'd probably have PM'd the user. But while it would be a convenient function, we know other parts are more important to Mahz.

Hmm... You're probably much better at informing the user about such policies. The writing wasn't half-bad so (s)he should be a good addition to the guild once it is clear to him/her how joining most guild RPs is done.
We can give ya the link if you drop by the IRC, shammancer.

Oh and Sep, we posted up a thread in the "Need help" section asking for the sudden rogue post in the IC to be removed.

The person one Reese Blackthorne could be a potential recruit, though. Utterly green Guild newbie, who probably did not know guild RP methods. We suggest someone (For example you Sep) contact him/her and invite. The post (since removed) wasn't all bad.
© 2007-2026
BBCode Cheatsheet