Light

For the Gods

On second thought, I think I shan't make a CS... yet. If it's ok with you guys, I'll open the OOC and we'll see if we can get more people into this.

Thieves Inc.

The Museum heist was one that Geno was already familiar with. He wasn't there when Brooker met with the client, but he was the next to know. The 'kids' were already putting together a plan, and a seemingly good one so far. Geno knew he would be the one to end up taking out most of the guard population on the night of the heist, albeit with significantly more lethal force than Brooker would prefer, but that's why Geno was the team's hitman and not Brooker. He had always had a thirst for killing that, when combined with his perfect silence, put even Brooker on edge. Regardless, investigating the building during the day under the guise of civilians was pretty smart.

Since he was already aware of the circumstances, Geno let his thoughts run away as his hands idled along one of the throwing knives he drew from concealed scabbards on his person.

For the Gods

I was going to make a time/space knowledge based god but I think it would be too similar to The Raven God. Luckily I have pages and pages of back up gods xD.

For the Gods

Ok here's the "prototype" CS. I think it's fair to say the three of us can all kinda take some level of charge in this rp, so let me get some feedback from you guys.

Champion

Name: obvious

Age: possibly not needed if these characters aren't mortals? could also be apparent age

Sex: could be apparent sex, or the character could be sexless (if they aren't simple mortals)

Appearance: obvious

Powers/Skills/Weaponry: anything your character does or use to engage in combat. try to keep in theme with your deity.

Deity

Name: obvious

Sex: again, possibly apparent sex or sexless

Appearance: obvious

Domains: what your deity is "the god of." try to keep in theme with your champion

Combined

Alignment: your god and champion's position of morals and views across the Law-Chaos and Good-Evil axis. dont think of this as a restriction on personality, but as a guide on general conduct as well as motives. two characters of the same alignment can have very different interpretations of that alignment

History: obvious

Other: anything else you feel to be relevant

I thought going with a three part CS could help prevent the redundancy of some information, and show that the player really is making two characters. I would think that dialogue or even conflict later on between the actual gods could arise.

Thieves Inc.

Sorry for the seemingly low activity on my part. I've been unforeseeably swamped with work this week, and my character isn't the most active and expressive. So it's a bit tough to have him "do anything" when it would be more in character to not do things. Which opens up the problem of do I not post or do I write one line/paragraph of Geno doing nothing.

Hell, even when I DID have him do a thing, nobody noticed. Which I suppose is good since he's the team's "ninja."

Kellam status up in this bitch.

For the Gods

Suit yourselves. I'm at classes right now though, and I have work right after. I will have time this evening to work on it.

For the Gods

Daglobster said
If I may insert my opinion, I don't think stat-based is a good idea. That's just me and my personal dislike of systems, though. I think going stat-less allows for more freedom.

Ive made stat and statless rps work well. It really comes down to personal preference.

For the Gods

notdeadyet said
Well, im a terrible Gm, so how about one of you two be the Gm, and I happily know that i helped bring up the idea. ^_^ than we all win! Yaaaay!

Haha if you insist! I'll make a CS template tonight or tomorrow after school and work. Do you want this to be stat based?

For the Gods

I've a good deal of experience GM'ing, so I can certainly help in that. I could also help make the CS format if needed.

Thieves Inc.

Ey Helsing if it's not too much trouble, could you log all the CS's in the OOC OP?