mdk

NaNoWriMo Discussion

I've done it a couple of times. You should try this. It does not matter if you're writing total crap. The sheer act of completing the challenge will improve your writing -- heck, getting close will improve your writing. It's something everybody ought to do.

.....also I have no idea what I'm writing, or how far I'll get, but I'm going for it again.

Frokane's Mildly Politcal Hangout Thread

I have to be perfectly honest, @mdk, that once I heard the Podesta Group and Mercury were and are involved, alongside Tony Podesta stepping down, and the dates Manafort is being investigated for all coinciding, I could not help but crack a grin. It is truly amazing to know that this is all they have managed to dredge, more fascinatingly there is also evidence to suggest they intentionally made no mention to the Trump campaign that the investigation had more or less started as far back as 2014 on these same issues. To add a crown to this, let us not forget that today was supposed to be "The Day" for collusion evidence...

... and nothing, nothing at all. Instead we even came to learn they rejected opportunities to meet with Russian leaders over legal concerns from the start as with Papadopolous. It was apparently even rejected by Manafort and was the White House who provided the evidence at all for the investigation.

@The Harbinger of Ferocity

Well yeah, this has to be a let-down for the collusion narrative crowd. But still, I was wrong about Manafort and I'll own that. Mueller apparently running a pretty tight ship, which I never expected out of the investigation -- some of those indictments announced today were a year old and nobody knew about 'em. That's a leak-free probe.

Whenever the story is "Trump isn't guilty," they seem to find a way to plug the leaks.

Frokane's Mildly Politcal Hangout Thread

FBI used investigation to raid Manafort, presumably found nothing because nothing came of it.

@mdk

whoops.

Frokane's Mildly Politcal Hangout Thread

<Snipped quote by mdk>

So you've accepted I didn't call you a racist? Brilliant, glad we could clear that up Pal.

@Dynamo Frokane

That is the strangest apology I've ever read.

Frokane's Mildly Politcal Hangout Thread

.....figures.

Frokane's Mildly Politcal Hangout Thread

Do you want me to start quoting you again?

@Dynamo Frokane

No.

129-130. I want you to either (a) recognize that the way you treat people in here is not very nice, not very fair, and change that behavior; or (b) at least stop pretending you're "strictly focused on the argument" and "very respectful." You're not. And I can put up with that, I just don't like the pretending part, given your attacks on me.

Or I guess (c), explain the reading of 129-130's exchange that doesn't constitute calling me racist. Hey, I've been wrong before. Not often, but it happens. What'd you really mean?

Frokane's Mildly Politcal Hangout Thread

And as far as MDK, he wrote a very specific accusation that I called him a racist, and then when I asked to provide evidence for said claim he backed down. Sounds like someone else in this thread doesn't it?

Dynamo Frokane

Oh is that what happened?

Frokane's Mildly Politcal Hangout Thread

Figures.

Frokane's Mildly Politcal Hangout Thread

<Snipped quote by mdk>

Quotes, I asked for QUOTES, I'm pretty sure twice now i've asked for quotes where I called you racist, if you can find the pages then you can post the quotes.

@Dynamo Frokane

Why? You know exactly what I'm talking about, and I know exactly what I'm talking about.

Would you like me to explain why I found that disrespectful, and/or are you saying all that was "on the argument?"

Frokane's Mildly Politcal Hangout Thread

Quotes or it didn't happen.

@Dynamo Frokane

129-130