The World

Myriad Reality

Legend said
Oh? I'm sorry to tell you that when things are true, they stay true. Besides, evolutionists attempt to use even older evidence, but I digress. Find something more recent that says otherwise.

There's a difference between evidence and data, bro. Data is what we collect from evidence, and is subject to change, as it is the purpose of science. Evidence is what stays the same, though whether or not the data from it applies to a certain hypothesis or theory is subject to change.
And no, if things are true, they don't always stay true. The sun is a star. This is true. It will not always be true, as it will go supernova at some point.
You are alive. This is true. It will not be true in 100 years.
Evolution brought about the current state of humans. This is true, There's a chance that we'll find a way to stop or skip evolution in the near future, so it may not always be true.
The evidence is that rocks are millions to billions of years old. The data is that the earth is 4.2-4.6 billion years old. Maybe we'll develop better tools and we'll gain data that says that it's 5 trillion years old. Incredibly unlikely, but possible.
The evidence is a spiderman comic. The data is that it takes place in a real location, but other data says that spiderman is not real, regardless of it's setting.
The evidence is a tablet talking about Zeus, with some accurate history in it. The data is that Zeus was worshipped long ago, and they recorded history through the lens of a group of gods doing it.

Make sense now?

The same way that you dismiss all other deity mythos as false is the way that everyone else dismisses yours.

Myriad Reality

Legend said
When cosmologists thought that the universe was smooth and homogeneous on its largest scales, they were happy to find that the background radiation matched perfectly to a "black body" curve. But when it became clearer that this smoothness did not really exist, it became necessary to find bumps in the background radiation, tiny non-conformities that could explain how the universe got from its smooth, homogeneous beginnings to a clumpy, discontinous present. Data from the COBE probe in 1989 seemed to confirm the perfect smoothness of the background radiation, although later interpretations by George Smoot claim to have found the necessary bumps. The picture I tried to attack is from COBE data that purports to show the anisotropies in the cosmic background radiation

If you're using data from 1989 then of course we're not going to get anywhere -_-

Myriad Reality

http://apollo.lsc.vsc.edu/classes/met130/notes/chapter2/graphics/rad_waves_new.jpg[/url

That is odd.

Myriad Reality

You mean like microwaves? The thing that you say isn't clumped?
And keep in mind, the universe is actually very organized, there's no really much clutter in the universe.

Myriad Reality

whizzball1 said
You're welcome xD

Damn connection not going through.
Firstly, either you're thinking of something other than radiation, or you got your info from a blatantly false source. Radiation takes the form of waves; they cannot possible be "smooth" as you claim.
Secondly, http://www.universetoday.com/79777/cosmic-background-radiation/[/url

Myriad Reality

Legend said
They wouldn't follow him. He did things the right and only way. You have no idea what would have happened otherwise.

Neither do you, so you can't say he did it the right way.

Myriad Reality

whizzball1 said
Well, there are already a tonne of things. I can't describe every piece of evidence. You give me one thing, I'll disprove it.

Background radiation.

Myriad Reality

Legend said
Not really. Women were treated much better than in most cultures. Plus, you completely ignored the "moral development" stance, because if he demanded perfection immediately, he would have lost his people.

If he didn't lose his people after all the killing he did, he wouldn't lose them over women being equal.

Myriad Reality

Ugh, my other two comments didn't go through last night.
Spirit, how were the things back up to the big bang proven wrong?

Myriad Reality

Legend said
Oh, Dark. Get as angry as you want, because it just makes my job easier. Regardless of what you claim, love isn't equal to romantic love. Romantic love is between a man and a woman. And if you'd truly wish to use that argument, I've kept a tab open for weeks, waiting until the next time you brought it up. Try reading this:

I knew you'd use that. The thing is, that supports my argument more than yours. It was a cultural reason, which an all loving god could and would demand change of, considering how evil it is to treat females like property. So yes, it doesn't FORCE the man to marry the victim, it forces him to ask the girl's FATHER to choose her fate instead of the girl herself. You keep ignoring that your book treats girls like shit.