<Snipped quote by Unhinged>
Hekrom: *opens my eyes, and glares at you*
I solved world hunger on Third Earth in three days, if you want productivity, I can guarantee it. After my nap, of course...
*yawns*
*falls asleep, standing up*
...
*snores*
<Snipped quote by Unhinged>
Coatlicue: I get that it worked, but Yander put it back into the MM, remember? I know we're talking about the one who did something impossible, but do you expect him to have found a way to keep the powers of it with it totally removed from him? Or are we waiting for him to come out of the MM like a newborn? Because if so, that brings up so many new potential issues that the likelihood of us having any impact becomes near zero.
<Snipped quote by souleaterfan320>
Again, I know it wasn't intended to be against me, but let's just pull up some stats quick.
Religious discussion: likelihood of involvement
David - 60/100
Whizz - 60/100
Sven - 30/100
Spirit - 10/100
Soul - 5/100
Dark - 70/100
Tox - 1/100
Heated discussion: likelihood of involvement
David - 70/100
Whizz - 40/100
Sven - 10/100
Spirit - 10/100
Soul - 5/100
Dark - 90/100
Tox - 5/100
Members who are almost identical in views: 3
Members with opposing views: 1
Members who are in between: 3
Members in between most likely to side with the three: 2
Likelihood of instigating religious discussion on any level:
David - 70/100
Whizz - 80/100
Sven - 40/100
Spirit - 5/100
Soul - 20/100
Dark - 75/100
Tox - 5/100
See what I mean about the stacked deck? We've already got a case study for what you're proposing, and it led to me being gone for a year. David, the "next in charge but actually the one in charge by any measurement despite us saying nobody is in charge" decided no more religious talk, didn't follow it, and the 4/5 decided it's fine for that but not for opposing talk (see members viewpoints) and "action was taken," in that I left because I clearly wasn't wanted. I'd rather avoid similar setups, even though it's our natural state.
<Snipped quote by Unhinged>
Mammon machine. Yamder's name for the original generate class.
<Snipped quote by souleaterfan320>
I personally feel we are regulating it, but idk.
<Snipped quote by Unhinged>
nah. The way you interpreted it fits with my personality, so it's in no way your fault. I should've cleared it up as I did it.
<Snipped quote by Mammalia>
Coatlicue: Really? Because it sure sounds like you all are trying to put a target on the head of someone we've actively avoided since the birth of, and the most vocal one seems to be doing it because her "poor boyfriend didn't win." Personal feelings shouldn't have a place here.
<Snipped quote by Unhinged>
Coatlicue: An abnormality!? You're the oldest one here, I thought at least you would have a grasp of our history! I know you don't study it for a living like I do, but you should at least know the Oblivion was supposed to be the only one! The fact that there were sixteen is the abnormality! Or do you actually think that- ... *Takes a deep breath and exhales slowly* Nevermind. Sorry for freaking out, you probably weren't talking about that. I get it, I'm biased because I'm happy because someone did the completely impossible and made the Triggers into one thing, but even without that, it's not our job to target someone. And if we do, then what? What's to stop us from turning into a force like those counts or whatever they called themselves back a ruling classes? Us? No, if we start targeting things we don't like, that's it. Existence gets a despotic group that can't possibly be overthrown, and that is exactly what are job is, to prevent that. To prevent some group or entity or being or whatever else from unchangable control. You all are talking hypotheticals, so let's go to one bigger. We go out in force and kill someone who's not even a Codex or in danger of taking permanent rule of everything. Next thing you know, we're doing that to everyone we don't like and we become exactly what we're afraid of. *Sighs* I'm not going to be a part of that, and I'm sickened that anyone here is advocating we let Baphumet dictate our actions for us. It's not you you I'm worried about strong-arming anyone, it's her.
<Snipped quote by Unhinged>
I didn't intend it as sarcasm. I meant it as "you said it perfectly, so I'll use your wording."
<Snipped quote by Unhinged>
What part of that was sarcasm? Perhaps I missed it...
<Snipped quote by Galaxy Raider>
>and I just want to tell you that without all the long rants or stern tones of voice.<
<Snipped quote by Galaxy Raider>
To be totally fair here, all three of you are giving a literalist take to the word "christian" when it comes to how they should behave. Insert rant on sects, etc. >and I just want to tell you that without all the long rants or stern tones of voice.<