ActRaiserTheReturned

Cute Little Buns

Ask Squee

Jorick said
The jokes wavered back and forth, actually. I've got a Schrödinger's penis situation going on, it's in a state of quantum superposition until observed, and not even I know which way it'll go.

Shut the fuck up about Jorick's D.

State-Church Separation

Well ignoring all the point's you confused between me and Brovo (which was basically the whole video), all I can say is ignoring the Nazi's hideous actions cause of one or two good things they may do or say is no different than ignoring all the violent acts of Christianity cause of one or two good things they may do or say.

The whole point of the video is that Hitler lied. Nazis were un-Christian, and even if you're saying that you don't believe they were Christian, you compared them to Nazis in the first place.

There is no coherent way to equate the two. Christianity does not produce mad men and lunatics. Lunatics and mad men produce corruptions of Christianity. Furthermore, the evil, despicable acts attributed to the Bible are either always because of some form of ignorance coming from the critic, or dishonesty. I like you enough to know that even though you are intelligent, you aren't dishonest either.

You have a form of ignorance that's not from a lack of brain power or dishonesty, but it's still ignorance. Buddhism, for example, has been pointed out to possess very brutal elements in Tibet before the equally, or perhaps far worse Communist bastards came along and crapped in the puke pie, but I don't believe that Buddhism is necessarily at fault, even if their society was theocratic at it's core.

I am quite tired of hypocritical critics (Not saying you are a hypocritical critic, Magic), stating some naive', foolish beyond words phrase like "Criticizing Islam is racist and bigoted" because many adherents of Islam are foreigners. It's hypocritical judgement calling Christians bigoted, when these critics don't listen to what Christians, or even secularists are even saying, and instead just gloss over what they say, censor them, if not in deed then at least in their attitudes. The definition of bigotry is refusing to learn when you are wrong, or at least refusing to accept you're wrong so that you can learn.

Yet Magic Magnum here, even though he is entitled to his views, and is respectable and smart without my own views, can go around arguing and debating with people like me (Not that's wrong to argue and debate with us), it casts suspicion on the sincerity of people who allow this from my view point.

I applaud Islam's few but notable virtues, such as hospitality, and mystical adaptation of an otherwise brutal Qurannic text. (I make no bones about it. I believe Islam is a cult, but I don't think it's people are all violent murderers or terrorists). There is supposedly even a text in the Quran about shielding infidels with Sanctuary when their lives are in danger, even though I have never read it. There's even charity in Islam, and I believe God smiles, at least in this life on the charitable, when their intentions are pure. ((Supposedly charity's flawed since it often goes to terrorist organizations, at least as much as I've heard))

Yet point out that murders are inherently not just done in the Quran, but very commanded in straightforward manner, even for the days we are living in, and you are branded some kind or racist hate monger. Now, in case I am wrong about the Quran just commanding the murders and horrible atrocities that have happened in the past to occur today, just consider this. . . Sufism, the third largest denomination in Islam, is in no position to overtake their faith and at least shed better light on what the Quran means, because as far as I'm concerned the Arabic of the Quran is just as brutal sounding as the English translations of it. Now listen because this is where I tie in Islam with this debate about Christianity, and thus Church and State.

The Bible, on the other hand, has ugly things about damnation, which I believe in, and condemnation of sins people think are not immoral. However, what is at issue here is the things which are carried out in this life, not the after life. The atrocities which were committed in the OT, and even the atrocities which are only claimed yet not present in the OT, are in the past, where they belong, and stay there. Not only that, but the Bible is written for whomever wants to read it, in Greek, Hebrew, and just plain English. It is very plain that the Bible wants us to live in moral ways that are very pleasant, produce good Samaritan neighbors, and peaceful men and women who are honorable and charitable, and seek the exhortation of others and not just themselves.

Final Fantasy: Awakened Souls

Fallen Muse said
I just explained it. As of right now only monsters can use magic. AS OF RIGHT NOW, it obvious that you will be able to eventually use magic considering you picked the zodiac signs which obviously represent different magical powers.

Tentatively still interested then.

Ask Squee

Where is the Crystal ball of Merlin and the Book of Eternity?

An Observation Before I go to bed

Azarthes said
While everyone else shits themselves about your opinions I'm going to go ahead and shit myself about the incomprehensible fucking post you made there

Shit your'self on the can.

Hitler Argues With Himself In Front Of Stunned Generals ((Spam Debate))

Keep this with Off-Topic(ish) rules

Respond to my Hitler Parody rant with your own as an argument.

Do not attack posters. Hitler saying something kind of mean is okay, because he's Hitler, but don't out right attack someone. For example, trying to tell someone through Hitler that they are "A know nothing" is against the rules. But in the video above, it's obviously Hitler's opinion of Magic Magnum. Not mine.

State-Church Separation

So Boerd said
I did not say prove the Christian God, I said ANY God, even a non-descript one.Um, no it isn't. That's just flat wrong. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Science 101.

Kay then. Since Magnum is not paying attention. . .what is YOUR opinion on Hitler's explanation. Poor Hitler. No one listens to him anymore.

State-Church Separation

Magic Magnum said
That's still not proof.Just because a god existing doesn't conflicting with a proven theory doesn't automatically give it evidence.I mean I could say a Unicorn exists, that technically doesn't conflict Evolution. A species could of always evolved into one.But there is no evidence to support it, so if I were to make such a claim it would have no evidence. Regardless of who else also believed it.And if we're talking strictly the Christian God, it does actually conflict. The Bible claims the earth is 6,000 years old. Science has proven the earth is several billion years oldSo the Bible is off by such a margin a calculator had to switch to letters and other signs to shorten the number it's off by it's so big. :PAs for specific pieces?You need to disprove evolution, cause the Bible is against that.You need to disprove the age of the Universe, the earth, etc.You need to disprove there are any other planets capable of supporting life, cause we are also meant to be the only planet there is with life.You need to disprove every other religion out there.You need to prove the existence of a god.You need to prove that said God is the Christian God.You need to prove the earth is 6000 years old.You need to prove there was a great flood that killed almost all of human life.You need to prove that dinosaurs and humans lived at the same time.And this is just off the top of the head, I guarantee if I bothered to sit down and think of this for a few hours I could add even more to both of these lists.You have nothing, not being able to provide said evidence is proof of that.God had 6000 years and infinite power to use to prove himself, yet he never does.You are honestly getting to the point where you're not even listening to the point's your debating against, making me think it was a mistake to start responding to you again. Even if you basically planted yourself right in the middle of Brovo's and Act's debate.The Bible talks about 4,000 or so years before Christ.And that was rules, times etc lead by the Christian God, Jesus's dad.Laws which were established as Christianity before Jesus came down, and according to the Bible (Which is also where Jesus's words come from), the OT was never ruled out/ignored.Unless if you mean to imply you worship Jesus, but not God.

What is your opinion on Hitler's explanation?

State-Church Separation