Avatar of ClocktowerEchos

Status

Recent Statuses

2 yrs ago
Current I do not "brainrot". I brainferment so my brain will become even smoother and even more potent than before in its smoothness.
2 likes
2 yrs ago
I live. I die. I live again!
1 like
4 yrs ago
I was gone for a lot longer than I thought >.>"
2 likes
4 yrs ago
Sorry for my absence! A Volunteering position suddenly turned into a Volunteer Leadership position I was not expecting at all so things have been hectic.
4 likes
4 yrs ago
Look at you posers, having to bang dragons or sell your soul for magic when you could just play a lute for some. Anyways, here's Wonderwall. - Bards
2 likes

Bio

:D

Most Recent Posts

<Snipped quote by ClocktowerEchos>

Sorry Clock I simply meant that the way we refer to, inference and use magic might best be left vague like Tolkiens work, not literally like THIS IS HOW MAGIC WORKS AND NOTHING ELSE approach.


So basically stuff like prophecies and miracle-like stuff that happen once in a blue moon?
Granted. You are know being force through a sausage press and are being turned into ground meet and shoved into a sleeve made of your own skin before being grilled or cooked with obscene amounts of ketchup.

I wish I could wish for something that I wished for most wishingly so I would wishingly wish about my wish.
<Snipped quote by ClocktowerEchos>

Well, it restricts use of potent magic only to those capable of zealous belief, obviously, that's one thing just off the top of my head. It also becomes difficult to draw a line between an actual science, with an underlying logic, and just plain superstition, if belief is all that is needed to interact with magic. Those two aspects are something we may or may not want, depending on the setting: it is fitting in WH40k, since that universe benefits from a grimdark setting with mad zealots, devotees, pious religiousness and constant war, but i don't think it's applicable to everything.

Also, i must correct you - the noopsphere is a concept strictly related to thought and has nothing to do with magic on its own; thought of course, we can choose to establish a connection between the two.

EDIT: no, really. is that passive aggressiveness oozing from your post, or is it just me being too touchy?


Knowing me, its most likely a combination of both, probably stemming from the fact this hasn't gone exactly the way I thought it would and that's the best way I can kind of explain it without going full on aggressive/mean.

There's also a bit of ignorance on my part as I've never read Tolkien so I wouldn't know about LOTR magics that people are suggesting. Basically I don't really know what people mean by Tolkien-style magic which is hidden but people know about it or something like that.
<Snipped quote by ClocktowerEchos>

I'm against tying magic and the realm of emotion and mind - aka "noosphere" - into one single entity; it may greatly limit what we can do with it down the road. A bit busy right now, but i'll try to provide a magical system of my own ASAP, as an alternative to be taken into consideration.


Mind if I ask how it would "greatly limit what we can do with it down the road"? I'm curious on how exactly something like the War/Noosphere/Arcanum would limit us.
I'm mostly worried about everything becoming a bureaucracy and tied up since people can't decide over things or just putting stuff off until later :\
Something else I just thought up of, should the landscape be realistic or more fantasy (ie epic waterfalls, floating islands, etc)?
<Snipped quote by Polybius>

I strongly agree with this. I'm considering the options, but again, this depends somewhat on the level of development...Can these people read? Can they write? If not, they certainly aren't sitting in libraries studying. Is magic learned or inherited? Where does it come from? If we agree that it exists at all....In an early civilization, if magic was to be taught, it would be an oral tradition, I should think. But it still had to come from somewhere in the first place, which is, I think, the point of writing a history...to answer these questions. And if I've just confused everyone else as thoroughly as I have myself, then it's going to be one of those days!

<Snipped quote by clocktowerechos>

I disagree. I think magic is a great tool to make the world interesting, more vibrant and readible. The 'cool' factor if you will. Writing a world that is just renamed real-world pseudo-cultures doesn't exactly appeal to me (or anyone else reading it for that matter) what we need are hooks and plotlines just like any good novel. Instead I think we should all agree on a set rule of law for magic.

I also think we should wait on using a map until more of the setting is understood/written. Thoughts?


I propose a magic system that's like the warp from 40k.

There is a separate "realm" where all the ideas, emotions and thoughts of all living things become real, for now we can call this is Arcanum. Once you have enough people doing a certain thing or believing in a certain thing, it will happen. So if one group of people have complete zealous devotion to their god or pantheon, said god will become real in the Arcanum. If there are a series of incredibly violent, bloody wars, there will be a god of war or bloodlust which will be formed.

This way, all living beings have a connection to the Arcanum but their minds "clouded" in the way that because they do not focus on a single idea or belief for long enough, they have little effect on it but can study/meditate/train to "tune" their minds thus becoming more powerful. There are also individuals who are naturally gifted with this "clear of mind" and can have greater access to the Arcanum without much training.

In terms of spells, this means that the more people you have focusing their minds on something like a fireball spell, the stronger it'll be because they are all believing in the power of the spell and are all focusing their efforts on making the spell a reality.

I'd like our nomad tribe have eastern vibes to its name: something like Zott, Pirkaj or Yoruks - a few names i picked up while reading wikipeidia articles on gypsies. :P


The current name I'm using is the Sarasaric but I might actually change it to sound more Mongol rather than Mesopotamian.
<Snipped quote by ClocktowerEchos>

For my part, I like "Selna" best. Not married to it by any means, so if everyone else likes something else better, that's fine, too.


We can always use it as a culture name (ie Roman & Latin) or just rename them later on.

I'm planing on calling them something more... primal for their tribe name for the time being. Their "final" name can be decided upon when they decide to get settled.
Happy Chinese New Years! :D

© 2007-2026
BBCode Cheatsheet