@Holy Soldier I just noticed that Jack isn't on the Smash Arena sign up sheet even though I asked. I hope you didn't forget me :C
@Holy SoldierSpeaking of typos and shit...
<Snipped quote by Holy Soldier>
Lol.
Sorry. Couldn't resist Forgot to point it out earlier.

@Crosswire@WingsOfBronze@Etherean FireActually, that may have to change. We can't have Sans with 1 HP through the entire game. Regardless how fast he is, there will be times where he'll get hit. I also await the day where I ban the character from ever being used in this game. Undertale will be a hard game to create continuous level ups for without anyone calling BS. The characters are more than likely going to be relying heavily on Special Abilities.
<Snipped quote by Crosswire>
because of how the stat system works they could effectively build sans as an incredibly fragile char by having only 1 in both defensive stats and putting almost everything into dex. thus making a Dies in one hit rule a bit redundant.
I would like to note that in undertale San's hp is 1. this is in the game files if you data-mine them apparently so in universe sans would in-fact die from any hit that does at least 1 damage. Which I imagine is most of them. Not an argument for putting that mechanic in I just thought I should note that fact for the discussion.
@Holy Soldier@WingsOfBronze
Okay, then. I simply wanted to address the "weakest enemy" clause. I think trying to build him as a player character from his boss mechanics might be a bit of a mistake. He can do whatever he pleases with stats, of course. I specifically mean that the segment suggesting that he can be felled in one hit might come as problematic. It only seemed to work that way in-game because the Genocide player was simply strong enough to do that, not because he was objectively weak (hence, they saw him as "the easiest enemy" by the time they reached him), but it was cancelled out solely by the fact that Sans was mechanically impossible to hit. Basically, the fight is programmed to drag on for as long as possible. Here, however, he wouldn't have an immaculate dodge as he did before, so to keep the part about him folding from even the weakest blow may present itself as something of an obvious issue.
My two cents, anyways. I could be completely wrong about some of that, or even just overthinking it. It's ultimately up to you two, either way; whatever you both decide.
@Crosswire You might want to change the mention from Holy Warrior to Holy Soldier. ^^"