@Smash You wouldn't know how you got blown out because you didn't even read his post. I can see that thinking isn't your strong suit but surely reading can't be that difficult?
<Snipped quote by The Harbinger of Ferocity>
lmao like I'm gonna read all that.
VERY quickly skimming your post, between all the purple prose and self fellating, I think your saying that the quote "Brevity is the soul of wit" is something I'm trying to take credit for which is uh...
lol
<Snipped quote by The Harbinger of Ferocity>
I think the fact that you're unironically quoting r/The_Donald as a source is one of the biggest signs that you're not arguing in good faith.
Out of curiosity, I feel the need to ask this question since it seems to have been brought up and this is the place that would best deal with it. Mind you "best" being that I might receive an actual explanation other than, "They're an 'Alt Right' group that shovels 'fake news' to push their hateful propaganda!" or some other equally limp wristed response that has no content to it.
What is so bad about Breitbart that any of the major news agencies could not be made equally guilty of in mirror? It should come as no surprise, but I would trust Breitbart to be more accurate than CNN, MSNBC, BBC and the like. I never go out of my way to read it, but the times I have, I have not been displeased with their reporting efforts or saw anything that were blatantly contradictory. For sake of timeliness, what I mean by that was how people were talking about Comey's testifying and how it somehow proved anything. It really did not, but some agencies took that as liberty to run with it.
Regardless, what is the "issue" with Breitbart?
Of course an opinion can't be wrong,
@j8cob I see you lurking you pseudo-intellectual, Ben Carson supporting, Flat Earth Conspiracy believing, Brietbart reading, Stefan Molyneux subscribed, David Icke's book purchasing, Skyrim modding, contrarian starter troll.
Bring your best pro libertarian arguments, I dare you.