Avatar of j8cob
  • Last Seen: 2 mos ago
  • Old Guild Username: j8cob
  • Joined: 13 yrs ago
  • Posts: 2468 (0.54 / day)
  • VMs: 3
  • Username history
    1. j8cob 13 yrs ago

Status

Recent Statuses

6 yrs ago
Current All the guy did was change his pic to a swastika, say some entry-level /pol/ bytes, and changed his bio to basic slurs.
6 yrs ago
You know exactly who.
1 like
6 yrs ago
I don't know why we can't blast both zoophiles and pedophiles at the same time. Two birds one stone.
7 likes
6 yrs ago
idk who needs to hear this but if you like women then you're gay, no ifs ands or buts
4 likes
7 yrs ago
I'm back.
1 like

Bio

Bitch, I'm the best.

Most Recent Posts

@Smash You wouldn't know how you got blown out because you didn't even read his post. I can see that thinking isn't your strong suit but surely reading can't be that difficult?
<Snipped quote by The Harbinger of Ferocity>

lmao like I'm gonna read all that.

VERY quickly skimming your post, between all the purple prose and self fellating, I think your saying that the quote "Brevity is the soul of wit" is something I'm trying to take credit for which is uh...

lol
<Snipped quote by The Harbinger of Ferocity>

I think the fact that you're unironically quoting r/The_Donald as a source is one of the biggest signs that you're not arguing in good faith.


He was saying your long wall of text was obvious plagiarism, because it was. I like how you also ignored almost everything that blows you out just so you can take a jab at a subreddit.
Out of curiosity, I feel the need to ask this question since it seems to have been brought up and this is the place that would best deal with it. Mind you "best" being that I might receive an actual explanation other than, "They're an 'Alt Right' group that shovels 'fake news' to push their hateful propaganda!" or some other equally limp wristed response that has no content to it.

What is so bad about Breitbart that any of the major news agencies could not be made equally guilty of in mirror? It should come as no surprise, but I would trust Breitbart to be more accurate than CNN, MSNBC, BBC and the like. I never go out of my way to read it, but the times I have, I have not been displeased with their reporting efforts or saw anything that were blatantly contradictory. For sake of timeliness, what I mean by that was how people were talking about Comey's testifying and how it somehow proved anything. It really did not, but some agencies took that as liberty to run with it.

Regardless, what is the "issue" with Breitbart?


They just do what CNN does but have less money so they catch flak for it more.
Of course an opinion can't be wrong,


An opinion can be and almost always is wrong when it is not based on fact and is devoid of reason. At that point it has become a belief.
Can someone explain the appeal to me of responding to obvious bait/troll posts?
That isn't even edgy though. Observations aren't edgy. If it burns that's because its true.

But what would you know about observations, you haven't made a single accurate one in any post I've ever seen you make.
Not anymore than your Fetal Alcohol Syndrome did.
It was an insult, but you'd have to know how to think to realize that.
@j8cob I see you lurking you pseudo-intellectual, Ben Carson supporting, Flat Earth Conspiracy believing, Brietbart reading, Stefan Molyneux subscribed, David Icke's book purchasing, Skyrim modding, contrarian starter troll.

Bring your best pro libertarian arguments, I dare you.


The only thing more baffling than your inability to think is your ability to only be able to comprehend unfamiliar things through sweeping generalizations. Credit where its due, you've found a way to be wrong more times in one sentence then I have ever seen before.
@Buddha@Dynamo Frokane

Y'all both crying over race insults rn tbh. P weak.
© 2007-2026
BBCode Cheatsheet