Avatar of ProPro
  • Last Seen: 2 yrs ago
  • Joined: 10 yrs ago
  • Posts: 2231 (0.59 / day)
  • VMs: 0
  • Username history
    1. ProPro 10 yrs ago
  • Latest 10 profile visitors:

Status

Recent Statuses

7 yrs ago
Current Starting new YouTube show, Hell Yeah Gaming! Lots of work to do still, but getting me to 100 subs for a custom URL would be of tremendous help! youtube.com/user/DarthGlamd…
2 likes

Bio

User has no bio, yet

Most Recent Posts

Aaaaaaalriiiiight, fantabulous. I'll get to work on one or more CS and put them up in order of my preference. Booyahkasha! Probably won't happen until tomorrow though, super busy today with my 6 month celebration with my girlfriend. :)
<Snipped quote by ProPro>

In the TV show, as far as the games are concerned the legendaries are the only ones shown to actually possess sentience.

Besides, even we forget certain skills when they fall into disuse.


I'm talking entirely within the games, the various other media have zero bearing on any argument I've made. For example, just look at the various pokedex entries for alakazam.

Its brain can outperform a supercomputer. Its intelligence quotient is said to be 5,000.

A POKéMON that can memorize anything. It never forgets what it learns--that's why this POKéMON is smart.

Its brain cells multiply continually until it dies. As a result, it remembers everything.


Isolated incident though, right? No. How about metagross?

METAGROSS has four brains in total. Combined, the four brains can breeze through difficult calculations faster than a supercomputer. This POKéMON can float in the air by tucking in its four legs.

It is formed by two METANG fusing. Its four brains are said to be superior to a supercomputer.

With four linked brains, it’s more intelligent than a supercomputer, and it uses calculations to analyze foes.


How about another? Here's actual pokedex entries on slowking.

It has incredible intellect and intuition. Whatever the situation, it remains calm and collected.

Every time it yawns, SHELLDER injects more poison into it. The poison makes it more intelligent.


Note that none of these are even remotely close to being legendary. The one thing they have in common is that these are each psychic type pokemon, but even normal human beings can be psychics in the poke-verse. You can easily scale that level of intelligence down and see that non-psychic are still smarter than most normal animals in real life. They learn, adapt, understand human speech patterns, possess problem solving skills, are capable of thinking outside the standard set by others of their species, and many other signs of legitimate intelligence. Also, I never once stated "sentience," you just did now, and there is a tremendous difference between "intelligence" and "sentience."

In short, I see no reason why, with evidence and lore given within the games themselves, a pokemon can only be limited to 4 moves at any one time beyond in-game mechanic balance. I completely support different skills building off from one another (I.E. ember becomes flame burst becomes flamethrower becomes fire blast) but that doesn't mean they should somehow completely forget how to hold back or use an old skill from earlier. Not every situation that needs fire thrown at it will require a full on flamethrower. Not every enemy that needs to be clawed down needs a metal claw when a simple scratch will suffice.
<Snipped quote by ProPro>

As for the move limit it could be looked at as an animal being unable to remember certain tricks it is taught when they become irrelevant while learning a move like Flamethrower could be seen as the Pokemon becoming more adept at what used to be Ember.


The second part of that makes sense and is what I'd be going for. I.E. General fire projection begins at Ember, becomes flamethrower, eventually becomes Fire Blast. The first part of that doesn't really gel with me, though. Pokemon are consistently shown to be nearly as smart as people (or significantly smarter, in some cases). There's not really a reason that memory would factor into a move limit. So what I'm aiming for is a general description of abilities which includes the current cap to their progression, the highest level technique that they would know in a given field (I.E. Flamethrower being the strongest fire-type move charmeleon knows, Double-slap being the strongest normal move clefairy knows, etc.)

Edit: Oh, and just for the record, the above is just an example of how I would like to run it, not the specific move limits. Flamethrower would require charmeleon to be at more than twice the level I intend for him, so no way in hell he'd have that off the bat.
@Prince of Seraphs Not an issue. I'll have that edited in each 'mon sometime tomorrow. For now, the bed demands my attention--and its being quite insistent about it.
@Ellion Mostly people are stating their preferences, and what they aim to claim. I myself have always fancied myself a jack of all trades, able to fill in any missing slot in a group. My preference would have been the water bender, but... *Glares at GM with vengeful eyes* ... Anyway! I can easily take any slot whatsoever. I'd go for the non-bender, but it seems plenty already want it, so I'll try my hat as either the earthbender or the avatar and see what comes of it.
<Snipped quote by ProPro>

I'll need a move list for each pokemon.


Wouldn't that go against your rule of "things have to make sense in a cohesive manner?" It wouldn't make logical sense to be stuck in the standard RPG move system. Unless I wouldn't be limited to just 4 moves each.
Are we deciding what everyone is going for before we start the rp. I.E. Should I claim something?


3) I will not be accepting any reservations for spots in the roleplay. The roles are not first come first serve, I will accept the character I feel brings the most to the team and the roleplay as a whole. IF more than one person happens to apply for a role then the character I think bests fit. Once I officially accept a character though the role is closed.
Alright, it took a while, but I've got Red ready. :D Let me know if you need more details on the individual 'mons, but they should all be fairly low level at this point.

@Prince of Seraphs

You can put me down as interested. Sad that you claim the waterbending instructor yourself, but I can easily make due with any of the other options, so long as enough consistent interest is garnered here.
@EnterTheHero Having computer problems again?
© 2007-2026
BBCode Cheatsheet