Avatar of The World

Status

Recent Statuses

4 mos ago
Current Need info, so might as well throw a bottled question into the ocean of statuses... What are some features/ideas/etc. that YOU want to see in a monster taming/raising game? All genuine ideas welcome.
1 like
5 mos ago
@Dane, I need you to talk to a physicist and a psychiatrist, in that order, twice.
2 likes
5 mos ago
"The worst thing you can do to a character is to make them aware that they're fictional." Ironically, the character who would say this is from an RP I'm not in anymore... Funny, that.
3 likes
5 mos ago
Just like in JJK, explaining the joke makes it funnier. Luckily that's built into this one.
3 likes
5 mos ago
Jimbo that's not right. Humans are a social creature, there's not a single one who can truly survive on their own. Even those who seem to be able can only do so because they learned from others.
8 likes

Bio



"Unfortunately, gods aren't the type that should be believed in."
"No doubt this drought will one day end, but it will be by tears."





Most Recent Posts

I may be a crack shipper but i dIDN'T KNOW WE WERE ALLOWED TO DO THIS AND HAVE CRACK FRIENDSHIPS INVOLVING THESE TWO
oh nO. OH NO
nOW I HAVE TO FIND A WAY TO DO THAT SO THAT CAN HAPPEN
<Snipped quote by The World>

It's not worth it, but if everyone's going to get confused over it, I don't want to implement it.


That's all I was concerned about, confusion. Because I know I'd get confused all the time and I don't want everyone else confused because of my confusion. In my mind, it'd not take away the ooc explanations, it'd just changed them from "where are they" to "where are they and was my response okay."
<Snipped quote by whizzball1>

When did Ruby get there?


This is proof we need signers. Just overhauling it is too much constant work for us as rpers. Especially after two years of getting used to location based.
We could use greentext for it even. That would be a single extra character.
<Snipped quote by The World>

What are you talking about? The characters know exactly what's happening, and this offers a supplement to the current system and a better explanation as to why it's on RPG in the first place. Changing from a network system in the first place was less logical a jump.


But it happened. We can't just change back randomly and have it make sense. We also won't have every character a part of it and have no way of knowing who is and isn't. We need a qualifier.
whizz we should add academycraft to the infinity we're doing
<Snipped quote by The World>

No, the reason it makes sense is because it can operate the same way the Ifunny network did. They can still be there in person and their devices will record it, but they can also communicate without being there. The in-person always system is inferior from a technical standpoint and has more flaws.


But from a logical standpoint it makes more sense. We can't just suddenly change the whole system by which things happen. And then when characters aren't a part of it we have no way of knowing that. We need to separate it so we know.
<Snipped quote by The World>

Oh, I don't think we do, actually. We can assume everything said is on the network, just like we were very self-aware of being on Ifunny.

<Snipped quote by souleaterfan320>

Anyone in the group.


But that's stupid because we've moved to an entirely in person style. Assuming everything is on the network when everything since we've come off ifunny has been in person would make no sense.
<Snipped quote by The World>

Hm?


Like how {} was triggers. That way we know it's the network and not in person.
© 2007-2026
BBCode Cheatsheet