@Xeiyenreisha You need to choose a summoning and a dueling course, not just one or both dueling courses aha. Try and fix that in your CS, please =P.

Also concenring Void Dragon: They're supposed to be strong. They have powerful effects with the trade-off that you have to give up something of your own, and I placed Tsukiko in the Earth dorm because she hasn't fully learned how to utilize that in-universe (As far as my understanding goes, anyway.) As for why they're first years... EVERYONE is a first year. I can't exactly make them a second year when I don't exactly have details on their dorm outlooks and the title of my RP specifically states 'First Years'.

And why the structure decks for those are strong, plot. I specifically mentioned the Academy supplying them with those cards because they want those two to do well this year, due to Shinrei's status. It'd also be a test to other students to see if they could beat a duelist like that at their near-prime, without any outside help.

EDIT: Also, I never said anything about Shinrei not being allowed near the first-years lol. The academy just keeps a closer eye on him and may pull him away for reasons, but he's still a student first and foremost. The thing about not being allowed to duel the first years in the placement duels is correct, tho. Plus, every student was accepted, this is just to determine dorm placements. Tsukiko didn't have to duel because of Shinrei's status, but they also want her to work from the ground up.

@Mintywater Can you please blank both of your posts in the RP and CS section? I have never given your character permission to be played. This is not a Jump-In Roleplay, you need to apply and have me accept your character before you can play. I'll let this slide for now, but let this be a warning that if you break more rules I'm going to have to leave you out of this RP. Also I would please ask you to put a little more effort into your posts, this is casual level and not free. I expect at the very least a paragraph unless you're in the middle of conversation. And even then, a para would be preferred. We also have not been assigned to dorms, and the placement duels are not over until I say they are.

@Mintywater As for your cards. HOLY SHIT THAT RANK 5 IS BROKEN. No, no, no. You can't make something like that. Scrap that, come back to me with a new idea, and list the required monsters next time.

what the fuck bronn is broken as well. Scrap that too. And change it's name, that's two card ripoffs and i don't see the link to the Dark World :U

Make it detach two and that card is better than its current state.

@The Irish Tree Per new custom deck rules, I actually have to balance out 10 of your cards haha. Sorry for the inconvenience =P.

As for Limiter Removal, I would not be against making it so a few turns have to pass before you can use it. I would say about five turns or so sounds good as it gives both players a chance. That would be the best solution to that problem. Add five or more turns have to pass before it can be used in a duel. The restriction does hurt, but it does not reduce the overall spirit and usefulness of the card.

So basically this? =P

Though, I'm not allowing Errata's like that. It'd make the thing too complicated to keep track of, and then you always run the risk of people not being with the times. At least with the numbers I announce their changed names whenever you get one so people always have a reminder.

@Ammokkx

Can you at least Ban the Limiter removal if we are at 4000 LP

(because OTKS are not fun)

@1Charak2Ahem. there is someone who can summon Blue-eyes turn 1 if she wants to

@1Charak2 Nah. It's good at one. I personally don't see the fuss over it, considering it can't be used in every situation even though it's a strong card.

As for IrishSilver's example, That's very niche and unlikely due to the amount of trap cards in our decks that stop both attacks and summons.

@1Charak2Ahem. there is someone who can summon Blue-eyes turn 1 if she wants to

thats not a instant win though. close but not a instant win.

@1Charak2 Eklispe turn 1 equips one of his monsters with a ton of spells and proceeds to OTK. Should I ban equips now? :U

@1Charak2 Eklispe turn 1 equips one of his monsters with a ton of spells and proceeds to OTK. Should I ban equips now? :U

Nah because Thats mutiple cards. not just 2...

@1Charak2 There's not a level 4 with 2000 ATK machine you can get out on turn 1, and cyber dragon needs a monster on your opps side. Then you still need another monster as a followup. So that's three cards, and if your opponent has a counter, -3 cards.

@1Charak2 There's not a level 4 with 2000 ATK machine you can get out on turn 1, and cyber dragon needs a monster on your opps side. Then you still need another monster as a followup. So that's three cards, and if your opponent has a counter, -3 cards.

3 cards... one efficent otk

@1Charak2 I summon Blizzard, bring back Zephyr, tune into Nothung, deal 800 burn, special Bora, then attack for 2400 and 1700. 3 cards, one efficient OTK

@1Charak2 I summon Blizzard, bring back Zephyr, tune into Nothung, deal 800 burn, special Bora, then attack for 2400 and 1700. 3 cards, one efficient OTK

efficency is the bane of everything...
watch it and reap...

@1Charak2 I summon Blizzard, bring back Zephyr, tune into Nothung, deal 800 burn, special Bora, then attack for 2400 and 1700. 3 cards, one efficient OTK

This requires Zephyr in grave. Something your opponent should remember to keep an eye on. Hence unless you discard him the same turn not a consistent otk. Limiter remover is a guaranteed otk just by being one card alone dropped at damage step. Try dueling kozmo and watch them drop a limiter for game.

@1Charak2 There's not a level 4 with 2000 ATK machine you can get out on turn 1, and cyber dragon needs a monster on your opps side. Then you still need another monster as a followup. So that's three cards, and if your opponent has a counter, -3 cards.

Also, this is false. karakuri haipa is 2100 lvl4 machine.

@The Grey Dust And you're saying you shouldn't be on the look-out for a limiter removal in a machine deck?

Plus you still need to draw the thing, and it's at 1. It's fine like that, it's not like you'd win turn 1 every duel just because limiter removal is allowed. I can't see it happening more than once in this RP. Shit like Trishula, Soul Charge and the various archetypes are banned because of their consistency in pulling it off and being anti-fun because of it, Limiter removal is good but not an auto-win even in 4000 LP. I'm more concerned about nurse + gift card than this stuff.

@The Grey Dust Conceded on the karakuri one. Still, that's a very specific card and it's not like someone going to build an entire deck just to two card OTK you.

@The Grey Dust And you're saying you shouldn't be on the look-out for a limiter removal in a machine deck?

Plus you still need to draw the thing, and it's at 1. It's fine like that, it's not like you'd win turn 1 every duel just because limiter removal is allowed. I can't see it happening more than once in this RP. Shit like Trishula, Soul Charge and the various archetypes are banned because of their consistency in pulling it off and being anti-fun because of it, Limiter removal is good but not an auto-win even in 4000 LP. I'm more concerned about nurse + gift card than this stuff.

We do have to admit however it is rather powerful in this format of 4k lp.

@The Grey Dust So is pretty much anything that does more than 2000 LP of damage. And YOU GUYS chose for 4000, not me. If you come back to complain about it to me now because of a card like limiter removal that isn't my fault :U

@The Grey Dust So is pretty much anything that does more than 2000 LP of damage. And YOU GUYS chose for 4000, not me. If you come back to complain about it to me now because of a card like limiter removal that isn't my fault :U

well was on the fence because some cards become god tier in 4000 lp matchs