I actually want to stop talking about this and walk agree disagreeing, but agreeing to disagree.
I don't agree about the Bible supporting rape.
Magic Magnum said
It was an example meant to be highlighting that it's discriminating against something you are and can't control.Now it seems to be getting circular there though, since you think homosexuality can be cured while I think it's something genetic and sticks around.So let me approach it from this way instead, outside of God saying that it's wrong what is actually bad about Homosexuality?@Bible Preference: Fair enough.@Homosexuality: Well if we wish to resolve this conversation and understand each other, rather than simply ending it here that seems to be the direction we need to go in.But before I do that I also feel the need to ask, define what you mean by Heterosexual and Homosexual acts before marriage.Do you mean sexual intercourse? Do you mean dating, kissing, simply being attracted?
Magic Magnum said
I get what you're saying.About 4 years ago I was a Christian who said the same stuff about Homosexuality.But look at it this way.Homosexuality is a sin.But Heterosexuality isn't a sin.That ultimately means one (Hetero) is better than the other (Homo) and that Heterosexuality is therefore a true and right sexuality while the others are flawed and wrong.It's the same as saying being black is a sin, but white isn't. Even if the being black was wrapped up with everything else, you'd still look at that and go "That's pretty unfair and discriminating to Black People".
Magic Magnum said
"Yeah, I agree too. I don't believe that you should be cruel to anyone you disagree with. God gave Sodom and Gomorrah time and time again to repent, this was back in the Old Testament when God was always on a punishing spree. That is Christianity attacking Homosexuality right there.Even if your argument is "Only those who actually act on their sexuality are condemned". That's basically saying "Do not be who you are, if you act as who you are you will be punished".
Ichthys said
I personally think a few distinctions need to be made.Are we talking about with those sexual orientations, of those who identify with either orientation or that are the orientations?Also, once that distinguishment is made, in what meaning of the word are we using "discrimination" (and the related words)? What do we mean when we use it? Are we comparing the items and saying one is better than the other? Are we simply saying they are different but equal? Perhaps the word is even being used in another meaning?Finally, once those two distinctions are made, what is really being debated here, using the prior distinctions to figure this out?As an outside observer, I'm confused over where some of the civil debate has headed, so I'm asking for these distinctions for my sake and the debate's sake.
Magic Magnum said
It may not be out of spite or prejudice, and it may very well be just what you think.But if you go around saying Homosexuality is a sin, but your's isn't it's Discrimination.It may be with decent intentions, but you're still treating something they are born with as if it is something bad and be forgiven for. It's like me saying "I think being black is a sin. I keep it in my head, and I still love black people. But being Black is a sin".
Protagonist said
As one man once said, you don't have to accept everything about a person's lifestyle in order to love them, conversely, if you don't approve somebody's lifestyle, that doesn't mean you hate or fear them.